Presentation + Paper
30 April 2019 Architecting doctrinally-consistent C2 infrastructure services
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Planning future Multi-Domain Battle (MDB) missions requires extensive, complex, and real-time collaboration and coordination between many Warfighting Functions and Domains such as Electronic Warfare (EW), Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT), Network Operations, and Cyber Operations. This collaboration and coordination requires synchronization of the associated domain processes and activities. Large Infrastructure projects for Command and Control (C2) are designed to integrate and align these processes through Information Technology (IT) services, such as decision aids, collaboration tools, and communication tools. New acquisition initiatives are driving infrastructure development to support the rapid fielding of capabilities through a modular software development approach. State-of-the-Art Shared Infrastructure Services can be developed using Agile Software Development (ASD) methods such as Scrum, Kanban, or Extreme Programming. However, the integration of these IT services cannot be easily planned since they are developed at the technology (i.e., software implementation) level according to the selected ASD method. Engineering the Infrastructure as Code (IaC) results in a gap between doctrinal processes and required system functionality since developers quickly code and configure small functional modular units at the technology level, while bypassing the traditional top-down waterfall flow from requirements to design. Furthermore, IaC does not explicitly require consulting a systems architecture. To improve the alignment of configured IT infrastructure services with doctrinal processes, this paper seeks to determine the extent to which agile Development Operations (DevOps) process can implement C2 doctrine while supporting dynamically-changing mission requirements and an operational environment. This paper proposes an automated Systems Engineering workflow to realize IT infrastructure services using Model-Driven Architecture (MDA) and a military DevOps.
Conference Presentation
© (2019) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Joseph B. Kroculick "Architecting doctrinally-consistent C2 infrastructure services", Proc. SPIE 11015, Open Architecture/Open Business Model Net-Centric Systems and Defense Transformation 2019, 110150L (30 April 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2519262
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Systems engineering

Chemical elements

Systems modeling

Software development

Process modeling

Information technology

Knowledge management

RELATED CONTENT

Consistent model driven architecture
Proceedings of SPIE (September 11 2015)
Entropy-based consistent model driven architecture
Proceedings of SPIE (September 28 2016)
J-MASS model verification and validation
Proceedings of SPIE (August 24 1998)
Using CASE tools to write engineering specifications
Proceedings of SPIE (August 25 1993)
SPEEDES: a brief overview
Proceedings of SPIE (September 19 2001)

Back to Top