Lithography of choice for the 45 nm node: new medium, new wavelength, or new beam

Fumikatsu Uesawa; Mikio Katsumata; Kazuhisa Ogawa; Koichi Takeuchi; Shinji Omori; Masaki Yoshizawa; Hiroichi Kawahira

doi:10.1117/12.535104

28 May 2004 Lithography of choice for the 45-nm node: new medium, new wavelength, or new beam?

Fumikatsu Uesawa, Mikio Katsumata, Kazuhisa Ogawa, Koichi Takeuchi, Shinji Omori, Masaki Yoshizawa, Hiroichi Kawahira

Proceedings Volume 5377, Optical Microlithography XVII; (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.535104
Event: Microlithography 2004, 2004, Santa Clara, California, United States

Abstract

In order to clarify the direction of the lithography for the 45 nm node, the feasibilities of various lithographic techniques for gate, metal, and contact layers are studied by using experimental data and aerial image simulations. The focus and exposure budget have been determined from the actual data and the realistic estimation such as the focus distributions across a wafer measured by the phase shift focus monitor (PSFM), the focus and exposure reproducibility of the latest exposure tools, and the anticipated 45 nm device topography, etc. 193 nm lithography with a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.93 achieves the half pitch of 70 nm (hp70) by using an attenuated phase shift mask (att-PSM) and annular illumination. 193 nm immersion lithography has the possibility to achieve the hp60 without an alternative PSM (alt-PSM). For a gate layer, 50-nm/130-nm line-and-space (L/S) patterns as well as 50 nm isolated lines can be fabricated by an alt-PSM. Although specific aberrations degrade the critical dimension (CD) variation of an alt-PSM, ±2.6 nm CD uniformity (CDU) is demonstrated by choosing the well-controlled projection lens and using a high flatness wafer. For a contact layers, printing 90 nm contacts is very critical by optical lithography even if the aggressive resolution enhancement technique (RET) is used. Especially for dense contact, the mask error factor (MEF) increases to around 10 and practical process margin is not available at all. On the other hand, low-energy electron-beam proximity-projection lithography (LEEPL) can fabricate 80 nm contact with large process margin. As a lithography tool for the contact layers of the 45 nm node devices, LEEPL is expected to replace 193 nm lithography.

Citation Download Citation

Fumikatsu Uesawa, Mikio Katsumata, Kazuhisa Ogawa, Koichi Takeuchi, Shinji Omori, Masaki Yoshizawa, and Hiroichi Kawahira "Lithography of choice for the 45-nm node: new medium, new wavelength, or new beam?", Proc. SPIE 5377, Optical Microlithography XVII, (28 May 2004); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.535104

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available