Paper
28 February 2006 Short-period superlattices: is thinner better?
G. J. Brown, H. J. Haugan, F. Szmulowicz, K. Mahalingam, S. R. Munshi, B. Ullrich, S. Houston
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
For type-II superlattices with spatially indirect optical transitions across the band gap, short-period superlattices are often employed. The oscillator strength of intraband transitions, from holes states confined in one layer to electron states confined in a neighboring layer, are enhanced by increasing the wave function overlap of these states through reduced superlattice period. However, there are limits to accurately controlling an epitaxially grown semiconductor superlattice structure as the number of monolayers in each layer is decreased. For InAs/GaSb type superlattices, periods of 40Å or less are relevant to mid-infrared detection. Characterization and modeling results for a series of InAs/GaSb superlattices with periods ranging 50Å to 20Å will be presented. These results explore the break point between when thinner is better and when reducing the period no longer optimizes the superlattice optical performance.
© (2006) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
G. J. Brown, H. J. Haugan, F. Szmulowicz, K. Mahalingam, S. R. Munshi, B. Ullrich, and S. Houston "Short-period superlattices: is thinner better?", Proc. SPIE 6127, Quantum Sensing and Nanophotonic Devices III, 61271I (28 February 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.666593
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 6 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Superlattices

Stereolithography

Gallium antimonide

Oscillators

Indium arsenide

Luminescence

Interfaces

Back to Top