Sampling artifacts, system design, and image processing

Gerald C. Holst

doi:10.1117/12.747757

26 September 2007 Sampling artifacts, system design, and image processing

Gerald C. Holst

Proceedings Volume 6712, Unconventional Imaging III; 67120C (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.747757
Event: Optical Engineering + Applications, 2007, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

Imaging system resolution depends upon Fλ/d where F is the focal ratio, λ is the wavelength, and d is the detector size. Assuming a 100% fill factor, no aliasing occurs when Fλ/d ≥ 2. However, sampling artifacts are quite acceptable and most systems have Fλ/d < 1. Sampling artifacts are most noticeable with periodic targets (bar patterns, picket fences, plowed fields, etc). Since real targets are aperiodic, the sampling theorem (frequency domain analysis) does not directly provide guidance in algorithm development. Sampling creates an edge location ambiguity of one pixel. Phasing effects and edge ambiguity are often overlooked when designing image processing algorithms.

Citation Download Citation

Gerald C. Holst "Sampling artifacts, system design, and image processing", Proc. SPIE 6712, Unconventional Imaging III, 67120C (26 September 2007); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.747757

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available