Paper
1 October 2013 Photon statistics: math versus mysticism
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Critical analysis is given for mystical aspects of the current understanding of interaction between charged particles: wave-particle duality and nonlocal entanglement. A possible statistical effect concerning distribution functions for coincidences between the output channels of beam splitters is described. If this effect is observed in beam splitter data, ten significant evidence for photon splitting, i.e. , against the notion that light is ultimately packaged in finite chunks, has been found. An argument is given for the invalidity of the meaning attached to tests of Bell inequalities. Additionally, a totally classical paradigm for the calculation of the customary expression for the “quantum” coincidence coefficient pertaining to the singlet state is described. If fully accounts for the results of experimental tests of Bell inequalities taken nowadays to prove the reality of entanglement and non-locality in quantum phenomena of, inter alia, light. Described. It fully accounts for the results of experimental tests of Bell inequalities take n nowadays to prove the reality of entanglement and non-locality in quantum phenomena of inter alia, light.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
A. F. Kracklauer "Photon statistics: math versus mysticism", Proc. SPIE 8832, The Nature of Light: What are Photons? V, 88320E (1 October 2013); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2022718
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Particles

Polarization

Quantum mechanics

Quantum physics

Beam splitters

Photon polarization

Sensors

RELATED CONTENT

The photon wave function
Proceedings of SPIE (August 04 2005)
Quantum Gaussian noise
Proceedings of SPIE (May 16 2003)
Two-particle quantum transmission
Proceedings of SPIE (October 15 2012)

Back to Top