Paper
9 September 2015 Requirements management lessons learned: fuzzy "most likely" versus clean shaven "not to exceed"
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Mission objectives often have a level of imprecision that lends itself to a fuzzy logic approach, even though the more traditional approach is to flow down bimodal pass/fail “not to exceed” type of requirements. Examples will be given for large astronomical telescope applications involving optical performance, active wave front and control, and radiometric/stray light controls demonstrating the pros and cons of the two contrasting strategies. This paper provides an overview of lessons learned on different programs and how that information can be used reduce the cost, schedule, and success of future missions.
© (2015) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Paul A. Lightsey "Requirements management lessons learned: fuzzy "most likely" versus clean shaven "not to exceed"", Proc. SPIE 9583, An Optical Believe It or Not: Key Lessons Learned IV, 95830B (9 September 2015); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2196564
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Error analysis

Optical alignment

Thermal modeling

Distortion

Fuzzy logic

Monte Carlo methods

Statistical analysis

Back to Top