Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Proceedings Article

Comparative evaluation of the performance of passive and active 3D vision systems

[+] Author Affiliations
Sabry F. El-Hakim, Francois Blais

National Research Council of Canada (Canada)

J. A. Beraldin

National Research Council Canada (Canada)

Proc. SPIE 2646, Digital Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing '95, 14 (December 1, 1995); doi:10.1117/12.227862
Text Size: A A A
From Conference Volume 2646

  • Digital Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing '95
  • Eugeny A. Fedosov
  • St. Petersburg, Russia | June 25, 1995


Automated digital photogrammetric systems are considered to be passive three-dimensional vision systems since they obtain object coordinates from only the information contained in intensity images. Active 3-D vision systems, such as laser scanners and structured light systems obtain the object coordinates from external information such as scanning angle, time of flight, or shape of projected patterns. Passive systems provide high accuracy on well defined features, such as targets and edges however, unmarked surfaces are hard to measure. These systems may also be difficult to automate in unstructured environments since they are highly affected by the ambient light. Active systems provide their own illumination and the features to be measured so they can easily measure surfaces in most environments. However, they have difficulties with varying surface finish or sharp discontinuities such as edges. Therefore each type of sensor is more suited for a specific type of objects and features, and they are often complementary. This paper compares the measurement accuracy, on various type of features, of some technologically-different 3-D vision systems: photogrammetry-based (passive) systems, a laser scanning system (active), and a range sensor using a mask with two apertures and structured light (active).

© (1995) COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.

Sabry F. El-Hakim ; J. A. Beraldin and Francois Blais
"Comparative evaluation of the performance of passive and active 3D vision systems", Proc. SPIE 2646, Digital Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing '95, 14 (December 1, 1995); doi:10.1117/12.227862; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.227862

Access This Article
Sign In to Access Full Content
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).



Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections


Buy this article ($18 for members, $25 for non-members).
Sign In