0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Proceedings Article

Experiments in augmented teleoperation for mobile robots: I

[+] Author Affiliations
Gary Witus, Shawn Hunt

Turing Associates

R. Darrin Ellis

Wayne State Univ.

Proc. SPIE 6561, Unmanned Systems Technology IX, 65610R (May 02, 2007); doi:10.1117/12.720850
Text Size: A A A
From Conference Volume 6561

  • Unmanned Systems Technology IX
  • Grant R. Gerhart; Douglas W. Gage; Charles M. Shoemaker
  • Orlando, Florida, USA | April 09, 2007

abstract

Teleoperated mobile robots are beginning to be used for a variety of tasks that require movement in close quarters in the vicinity of moving and parked vehicles, buildings and other man-made structures, and the target object for inspection or manipulation. The robots must be close enough to deploy short-range sensors and manipulators, and must be able to maneuver without potentially damaging collisions. Teleoperation is fatiguing and stressful even without the requirement for close positioning. In cooperation with the TARDEC Robotic Mobility Laboratory (TRML), we are investigating approaches to reduce workload and improve performance through augmented teleoperation. Human-robot interfaces for teleoperation commonly provide two degrees-of-freedom (DoF) motion control with visual feedback from an on-board egocentric camera and no supplemental distance or orientation cueing. This paper reports on the results of preliminary experiments to assess the effects on man-machine task performance of several options for augmented teleoperation: (a) 3 DoF motion control (rotation and omni-directional translation) versus 2 DoF control (rotation and forward/reverse motion), (b) on-board egocentric camera versus fixed-position overwatch camera versus dual egocentric-and-overwatch cameras, and (c) presence or absence of distance and orientation visual cueing. We examined three dimensions of performance: completion time, spatial accuracy, and workspace area. We investigated effects on the expected completion time and on the variance in completion time. Spatial accuracy had three components: orientation, aimpoint, and distance. We collected performance under different task conditions: (a) three position-and-orientation tolerance or accuracy objectives, and (b) four travel distances between successive inspection points. We collected data from three subjects. We analyzed the main effects and conditional interaction effects among the teleoperation options and task conditions. We were able to draw some definitive conclusions regarding the relative performance of design alternatives, and conditions under which their performance degraded. We made some observations regarding operator behaviors, which suggested some potential augmented teleoperation enhancements.

© (2007) COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Citation

Gary Witus ; Shawn Hunt and R. Darrin Ellis
"Experiments in augmented teleoperation for mobile robots: I", Proc. SPIE 6561, Unmanned Systems Technology IX, 65610R (May 02, 2007); doi:10.1117/12.720850; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.720850


Access This Article
Sign In to Access Full Content
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
 

Figures

Tables

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

Advertisement


Buy this article ($18 for members, $25 for non-members).
Sign In