Assessing the impact of image manipulation on users' perceptions of deception

Valentina Conotter; Duc-Tien Dang-Nguyen; Giulia Boato; María Menéndez; Martha Larson

doi:10.1117/12.2039418

25 February 2014 Assessing the impact of image manipulation on users' perceptions of deception

Valentina Conotter, Duc-Tien Dang-Nguyen, Giulia Boato, María Menéndez, Martha Larson

Proceedings Volume 9014, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XIX; 90140Y (2014) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2039418
Event: IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2014, San Francisco, California, United States

Abstract

Generally, we expect images to be an honest reflection of reality. However, this assumption is undermined by the new image editing technology, which allows for easy manipulation and distortion of digital contents. Our understanding of the implications related to the use of a manipulated data is lagging behind. In this paper we propose to exploit crowdsourcing tools in order to analyze the impact of different types of manipulation on users’ perceptions of deception. Our goal is to gain significant insights about how different types of manipulations impact users’ perceptions and how the context in which a modified image is used influences human perception of image deceptiveness. Through an extensive crowdsourcing user study, we aim at demonstrating that the problem of predicting user-perceived deception can be approached by automatic methods. Analysis of results collected on Amazon Mechanical Turk platform highlights how deception is related to the level of modifications applied to the image and to the context within modified pictures are used. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first attempt to address to the image editing debate using automatic approaches and going beyond investigation of forgeries.

Citation Download Citation

Valentina Conotter, Duc-Tien Dang-Nguyen, Giulia Boato, María Menéndez, and Martha Larson "Assessing the impact of image manipulation on users' perceptions of deception", Proc. SPIE 9014, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XIX, 90140Y (25 February 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2039418

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available