Ambient optomechanical alignment and pupil metrology for the flight instruments aboard the James Webb Space Telescope

Phillip Coulter; Alexander Beaton; Jeffery S. Gum; Theodore J. Hadjimichael; Joseph E. Hayden; Susann Hummel; Jason E. Hylan; David Lee; Timothy J. Madison; Michael Maszkiewicz; Kyle F. Mclean; Joseph McMann; Markus Melf; Linda Miner; Raymond G. Ohl IV; Kevin Redman; Andreas Roedel; Paul Schweiger; Maurice Te Plate; Martyn Wells; Greg W. Wenzel; Patrick K. Williams; Jerrod Young

doi:10.1117/12.2065017

8 September 2014 Ambient optomechanical alignment and pupil metrology for the flight instruments aboard the James Webb Space Telescope

Phillip Coulter, Alexander Beaton, Jeffery S. Gum, Theodore J. Hadjimichael, Joseph E. Hayden, Susann Hummel, Jason E. Hylan, David Lee, Timothy J. Madison, Michael Maszkiewicz, Kyle F. Mclean, Joseph McMann, Markus Melf, Linda Miner, Raymond G. Ohl IV, Kevin Redman, Andreas Roedel, Paul Schweiger, Maurice Te Plate, Martyn Wells, Greg W. Wenzel, Patrick K. Williams, Jerrod Young

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9195, Optical System Alignment, Tolerancing, and Verification VIII; 91950G (2014) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2065017
Event: SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, 2014, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

While efforts within the optics community focus on the development of high-quality systems and data products, comparatively little attention is paid to their use. Our standards for verification and validation are high; but in some user domains, standards are either lax or do not exist at all. In forensic imagery analysis, for example, standards exist to judge image quality, but do not exist to judge the quality of an analysis. In litigation, a high quality analysis is by default the one performed by the victorious attorney’s expert. This paper argues for the need to extend quality standards into the domain of imagery analysis, which is expected to increase in national visibility and significance with the increasing deployment of unmanned aerial vehicle—UAV, or “drone”—sensors in the continental U. S.. It argues that like a good radiometric calibration, made as independent of the calibrated instrument as possible, a good analysis should be subject to standards the most basic of which is the separation of issues of scientific fact from analysis results.

Citation Download Citation

Phillip Coulter, Alexander Beaton, Jeffery S. Gum, Theodore J. Hadjimichael, Joseph E. Hayden, Susann Hummel, Jason E. Hylan, David Lee, Timothy J. Madison, Michael Maszkiewicz, Kyle F. Mclean, Joseph McMann, Markus Melf, Linda Miner, Raymond G. Ohl IV, Kevin Redman, Andreas Roedel, Paul Schweiger, Maurice Te Plate, Martyn Wells, Greg W. Wenzel, Patrick K. Williams, and Jerrod Young "Ambient optomechanical alignment and pupil metrology for the flight instruments aboard the James Webb Space Telescope", Proc. SPIE 9195, Optical System Alignment, Tolerancing, and Verification VIII, 91950G (8 September 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2065017

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available