|
Summary1-IntroductionFiber optic technology has been advancing at a surprising pace during the last three decades. It was about fifteen years ago that researchers showed the great potential of optical fiber doped with the rare-earth elements such as erbium and praseodymium, for application in long haul communications. Optical amplifiers have been successfully incorporated in the field of fiber communication, accelerating the rate at which optical links are being deployed over the continents and the transoceanics. Today, this technology is fast becoming a major part of optical communications infrastructure in many countries around the world [1, 2]. Therefore, in order to learn this technology at university level, we need to understand the procedure of optical amplification in fiber amplifiers from basic to advance. From this point of view, the education and training programs will make easy to understand the procedure of optical amplification in fiber amplifiers. 2-Schematic Representations of AmplificationThis work will enable us to understand the basic physical concepts underlying three and four level fiber amplifiers and obtaining the signal gain of amplifiers by using rate equation models. Figure 1 shows the schematic representations of the energy levels and amplifications mechanism for Er3+ (left hand side of picture) and Pr3+ (right hand side of picture) ions doped in glass hosts. The energies and populations of three and four level amplifiers can be described by E0, E1, E2 (= E21 + E22), E3 and N0, N1, N2 ( = N21 + N22), N3, respectively, for the thermal equilibrium. By definition, levels 0 and 1 are the lowest or ground state, level 2 is the metastable state, and level 3 is the pump level. The stimulated transition probability Rp is the probability of exciting the ion from level 1 to level 3 for erbium, and from level 0 to level 3 for praseodymium by pumping, and Rs will be referred to the stimulated transition probability between E2 and E1. Let us now consider the steady-state situation, where the populations are time invariant, i.e., doped fiber, doped fiber. Here, β quantity is involved in the issue because of the E2 and E3 levels of Er3+ and the E22 and E21 levels of Pr3+-doped fibers are very closely spaced according to the Boltzmann’s population relation (ΔEm = Em – Em–1, kB = 1,38x10−23J/K). We consider an absorbing medium for the description of the signal gain. The signal gain is given by G = exp[Γs (σ21N2 – σ21N1)L] for Er3+-doped fiber [3] and by G = exp[Γsσ2sN22L] for Pr3+-doped fiber amplifiers [1]. Here, L denotes the fiber amplifier length and the other parameters represent the standard fiber parameters. 3-ConclusionsWe have introduced simple schematic representations for energy levels and amplification mechanisms, and used the basic rate equation models, including the temperature effect to obtain the signal gain of the erbium and praseodymium-doped fiber amplifiers at university level. In addition, we have shown the possibility of deriving an analytical solution of the rate equations in some practical temperature ranges to understand the gain performance of both fiber amplifiers. AcknowledgmentThis study is supported by Scientific Research Projects Council (SRPC) of Erciyes University under Grant No FBA-04-01. ReferencesP.C. Becker, N. Olsson, J. Simpson, Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers: Fundamentals and Technology, Academic Press, San Diego
(1999). Google Scholar
K. Amano and Y. Iwamoto,
“Optical Fiber Submarine Cable System,”
Journal of Lightwave Technology, 8
(4), 595
(1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/50.50766 Google Scholar
C. Berkdemir and S. Özsoy,
“The temperature dependent performance analysis of EDFAs pumped at 1480 nm: A more accurate propagation equation,”
Optics Express, 13
(13), 5179
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.005179 Google Scholar
|