Open Access Paper
6 October 2003 Minimizing the uncertainty about the uncertainty principle
G. K. Vemulapalli, A. S. Marathay
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 9663, Eighth International Topical Meeting on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics; 96630A (2003) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2208375
Event: Eighth International Topical Meeting on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics, 2003, Tucson, Arizona, United States
Abstract
Uncertainty principle forms a crucial part of quantum theory and wave optics. By using the propagation of a scalar, 3-D wave packet with and without dispersion as a heuristic device, we examine different aspects of the principle as it applies to transverse and longitudinal dispersion, and to time-dependent and stationary states.

Summary

A firm understanding of the uncertainty principle, both on qualitative and quantitative level, is essential for mastery of quantum theory, wave and quantum optics. Nevertheless many students are confused about what the principle actually states, very likely because of its historical developments [1,2]. Heisenberg’s original formulation [3], with y-ray microscope as an example, considered the distribution of positions and momenta in an ensemble of particles following a scattering experiment. Later Heisenberg [4] and Kennard [5] demonstrated that uncertainty principle results from a Fourier transform relation between momentum and position distribution functions.

When these two aspects of the uncertainty principle are lumped together, as it is done often, needless confusion arises. One-dimensional wave packets used as models in textbooks [6] are inadequate to illustrate the full scope of the principle.

We derive the appropriate amplitude function to describe the propagation in space and time of a 3-D wave packet that exhibits both the longitudinal and transverse dispersion. With this amplitude function and the corresponding probability density function, one can give a clear account of the uncertainty principle and how it leads to different interpretations depending upon whether one is describing an individual quantum state or an ensemble of particles.

References

1. 

Raymer, M. G., “Uncertainty Principle for Joint Measurement of Noncommuting Variables,” Am. J. Phys, 62 (11), 986 –993 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17657 Google Scholar

2. 

Hilgevoord, J and Uffink, J., “A New View of the Uncertainty Principle,” Sixty-two years of uncertainty, 121 –137 Plenum Press, New York (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8771-8 Google Scholar

3. 

Heisenberg, W., “Uber den anschaulichen Inhalt der Quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,” Z. Phys, 43 172 –198 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280 Google Scholar

4. 

Heisenberg W., “The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory,” Dover, New York (1930). Google Scholar

5. 

Kennard, E. H., “Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen,” Z. Phys, 44 326 –352 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01391200 Google Scholar

6. 

Cohen-Tannoudji, C, Diu, B and Laloë, F, “Quantum Mechanics,” Wiley, New York (1977). Google Scholar
© (2003) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
G. K. Vemulapalli and A. S. Marathay "Minimizing the uncertainty about the uncertainty principle", Proc. SPIE 9663, Eighth International Topical Meeting on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics, 96630A (6 October 2003); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2208375
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Quantum optics

Quantum physics

Wave propagation

Particles

3D modeling

Chemistry

Fourier transforms

Back to Top