Accuracy in optical overlay metrology

Barak Bringoltz; Tal Marciano; Tal Yaziv; Yaron DeLeeuw; Dana Klein; Yoel Feler; Ido Adam; Evgeni Gurevich; Noga Sella; Ze'ev Lindenfeld; Tom Leviant; Lilach Saltoun; Eltsafon Ashwal; Dror Alumot; Yuval Lamhot; Xindong Gao; James Manka; Bryan Chen; Mark Wagner

doi:10.1117/12.2219176

24 March 2016 Accuracy in optical overlay metrology

Barak Bringoltz, Tal Marciano, Tal Yaziv, Yaron DeLeeuw, Dana Klein, Yoel Feler, Ido Adam, Evgeni Gurevich, Noga Sella, Ze'ev Lindenfeld, Tom Leviant, Lilach Saltoun, Eltsafon Ashwal, Dror Alumot, Yuval Lamhot, Xindong Gao, James Manka, Bryan Chen, Mark Wagner

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9778, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXX; 97781H (2016) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2219176
Event: SPIE Advanced Lithography, 2016, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the mechanism by which process variations determine the overlay accuracy of optical metrology. We start by focusing on scatterometry, and showing that the underlying physics of this mechanism involves interference effects between cavity modes that travel between the upper and lower gratings in the scatterometry target. A direct result is the behavior of accuracy as a function of wavelength, and the existence of relatively well defined spectral regimes in which the overlay accuracy and process robustness degrades (`resonant regimes’). These resonances are separated by wavelength regions in which the overlay accuracy is better and independent of wavelength (we term these `flat regions’). The combination of flat and resonant regions forms a spectral signature which is unique to each overlay alignment and carries certain universal features with respect to different types of process variations. We term this signature the `landscape’, and discuss its universality. Next, we show how to characterize overlay performance with a finite set of metrics that are available on the fly, and that are derived from the angular behavior of the signal and the way it flags resonances. These metrics are used to guarantee the selection of accurate recipes and targets for the metrology tool, and for process control with the overlay tool. We end with comments on the similarity of imaging overlay to scatterometry overlay, and on the way that pupil overlay scatterometry and field overlay scatterometry differ from an accuracy perspective.

Citation Download Citation

Barak Bringoltz, Tal Marciano, Tal Yaziv, Yaron DeLeeuw, Dana Klein, Yoel Feler, Ido Adam, Evgeni Gurevich, Noga Sella, Ze'ev Lindenfeld, Tom Leviant, Lilach Saltoun, Eltsafon Ashwal, Dror Alumot, Yuval Lamhot, Xindong Gao, James Manka, Bryan Chen, and Mark Wagner "Accuracy in optical overlay metrology", Proc. SPIE 9778, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXX, 97781H (24 March 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2219176

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available