Paper
23 February 2017 Comparing the photothermal effects of gold nanorods and single-walled carbon nanotubes in cancer models
Connor L. West, Aamr M. Hasanjee, Blake Young, Roman Wolf II, Kegan Silk, Rianna Ingalls, Feifan Zhou, Wei R. Chen
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 10065, Biophotonics and Immune Responses XII; 100650R (2017) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2250704
Event: SPIE BiOS, 2017, San Francisco, California, United States
Abstract
Laser Immunotherapy (LIT) is an innovative cancer treatment modality that is specifically targeted towards treating late-stage, metastatic cancer. This treatment modality utilizes laser irradiation in combination with active immune system stimulation to induce a systemic anti-tumor immune response against metastatic cancer. Nanoparticles have recently been utilized to support and increase the photothermal effect of the laser irradiation by absorbing the light energy produced from the laser and converting that energy into thermal energy. In the past, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have been the main choice in nanotechnology, however, recent studies have shown that gold nanorods (AuNRs) are a prospective alternative that may produce photothermal effects similar to SWNTs. Due to the precedence of gold biomaterials currently having approval for use in various treatments for humans, AuNRs are regarded to be a safer option than SWNTs. The goal of this study is to precisely compare any differences in photothermal effects between AuNRs and SWNTs. Both types of nanoparticles were irradiated with the same wavelength of near-infrared light to ascertain the photothermal effects in gel phantom tumor models, aqueous solutions, and metastatic cancer cell cultures. We discerned from the results that the AuNRs could be equally or more effective than SWNTs in absorbing the light energy from the laser and converting it into thermal energy. In both solution and gel studies, AuNRs were shown to be more efficient than SWNTs in creating thermal energy, while in cell studies, no definitive differences between AuNRs and SWNTs were observed. The cytotoxicity of both nanoparticles needs further assessment in future studies. Given these results, AuNRs are comparable to SWNTs, even superior in certain aspects. This advances the opportunity to use AuNRs as replacements for SWNTs in LIT treatments. The results from this study will contribute to any subsequent studies in the development of this cancer modality using photothermal therapy enhanced by nanoparticles.
© (2017) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Connor L. West, Aamr M. Hasanjee, Blake Young, Roman Wolf II, Kegan Silk, Rianna Ingalls, Feifan Zhou, and Wei R. Chen "Comparing the photothermal effects of gold nanorods and single-walled carbon nanotubes in cancer models", Proc. SPIE 10065, Biophotonics and Immune Responses XII, 100650R (23 February 2017); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2250704
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Single walled carbon nanotubes

Cancer

Oncology

Photothermal effect

Gold

Nanomaterials

Nanoparticles

Back to Top