Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Proceedings Article

Scanning exposures with a MAPPER multibeam system

[+] Author Affiliations
C. van den Berg, G. de Boer, S. Boschker, G. Holgate, R. Jager, J. J. Koning, V. Kuiper, Yue Ma, I. L. van Mil, H. W. Mook, T. Ooms, T. van de Peut, M. Sanderse, P. Scheffers, E. Slot, A. Tudorie, A. M. C. Valkering, N. Vergeer, M. J. Wieland, B. J. Kampherbeek

MAPPER Lithography (Netherlands)

E. A. Hakkennes, M. Hoving, N. Venema, A. Weirsma, S. Woutersen

Technolution B.V. (Netherlands)

S. Postma

DEMCON (Netherlands)

Proc. SPIE 7970, Alternative Lithographic Technologies III, 79700D (April 01, 2011); doi:10.1117/12.881572
Text Size: A A A
From Conference Volume 7970

  • Alternative Lithographic Technologies III
  • Daniel J. C. Herr
  • San Jose, California, USA | February 27, 2011

abstract

Currently, three MAPPER multi-electron beam lithography tools are operational. Two are located at customers, TSMC and LETI, and one is located at MAPPER. The tools at TSMC and LETI are used for process development. These tools each have 110 parallel electron beams and have demonstrated sub-30 nm half pitch resolution in chemically amplified resists. One important step towards the high volume tool is the capability to stitch the exposure of one electron beam to the next. The pre-alpha tool at MAPPER has been upgraded with an interferometer to enable exposures with a scanning stage and demonstrate first beam-to-beam stitching. A scan of 200 micrometers has been used to create a stitch area of 50 x 3 microns. The stitch error over all stitches was found to be below 25 nm. The electron beam position stability during the 10 seconds required for beam-to-beam stitching showed a contribution to the stitch error of 2.3 nm. The beam separation measurement, used to correct the static error, adds about 2.2 nm and the stage stability and linearity adds another 5 nm in the scan (interferometer) direction. In the perpendicular direction the stage instability gives the largest contribution to the stitch error (15 nm) due to the use of capacitive sensors. Overall, the electron beam stability and the beam position correction method work correctly and with sufficient accuracy for the high volume tool, 'Matrix'. The wafer stage for the Matrix system will incorporate full interferometer control to attain the needed positioning accuracy and stability.

© (2011) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Citation

C. van den Berg ; G. de Boer ; S. Boschker ; E. A. Hakkennes ; G. Holgate, et al.
"Scanning exposures with a MAPPER multibeam system", Proc. SPIE 7970, Alternative Lithographic Technologies III, 79700D (April 01, 2011); doi:10.1117/12.881572; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.881572


Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this proceeding ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).

Figures

Tables

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

Advertisement
  • Don't have an account?
  • Subscribe to the SPIE Digital Library
  • Create a FREE account to sign up for Digital Library content alerts and gain access to institutional subscriptions remotely.
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this proceeding ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Chapter

Access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions and is not available as part of a personal subscription. Print or electronic versions of individual SPIE books may be purchased via SPIE.org.