0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Proceedings Article

Spitzer warm mission transition and operations

[+] Author Affiliations
William A. Mahoney, Lisa J. Garcia, Douglas B. McElroy, Vince G. Mannings, JoAnn C. O'Linger, Elena Scire

Spitzer Science Ctr., California Institute of Technology (USA)

Joseph Hunt, Jr., David S. Mittman, Marc Sarrel

Jet Propulsion Lab. (USA)

Proc. SPIE 7737, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III, 77371W (July 29, 2010); doi:10.1117/12.857814
Text Size: A A A
From Conference Volume 7737

  • Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III
  • David R. Silva; Alison B. Peck; B. Thomas Soifer
  • San Diego, California | June 27, 2010

abstract

Following the successful dynamic planning and implementation of IRAC Warm Instrument Characterization activities, transition to Spitzer Warm Mission operations has gone smoothly. Operation teams procedures and processes required minimal adaptation and the overall composition of the Mission Operation System retained the same functionality it had during the Cryogenic Mission. While the warm mission scheduling has been simplified because all observations are now being made with a single instrument, several other differences have increased the complexity. The bulk of the observations executed to date have been from ten large Exploration Science programs that, combined, have more complex constraints, more observing requests, and more exo-planet observations with durations of up to 145 hours. Communication with the observatory is also becoming more challenging as the Spitzer DSN antenna allocations have been reduced from two tracking passes per day to a single pass impacting both uplink and downlink activities. While IRAC is now operating with only two channels, the data collection rate is roughly 60% of the four-channel rate leaving a somewhat higher average volume collected between the less frequent passes. Also, the maximum downlink data rate is decreasing as the distance to Spitzer increases requiring longer passes. Nevertheless, with well over 90% of the time spent on science observations, efficiency has equaled or exceeded that achieved during the cryogenic mission.

© (2010) COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Citation

William A. Mahoney ; Lisa J. Garcia ; Joseph Hunt, Jr. ; Douglas B. McElroy ; Vince G. Mannings, et al.
"Spitzer warm mission transition and operations", Proc. SPIE 7737, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III, 77371W (July 29, 2010); doi:10.1117/12.857814; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.857814


Access This Article
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
 
Sign In to Access Full Content

Figures

Tables

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

Advertisement
Buy this article ($18 for members, $25 for non-members).
Sign In