Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Proceedings Article

Comparing subjective image quality measurement methods for the creation of public databases

[+] Author Affiliations
Judith Redi, Rodolfo Zunino

Univ. of Genoa (Italy)

Hantao Liu, Hani Alers

Delft Univ. of Technology (Netherlands)

Ingrid Heynderickx

Delft Univ. of Technology (Netherlands) and Philips Research Labs. (Netherlands)

Proc. SPIE 7529, Image Quality and System Performance VII, 752903 (January 18, 2010); doi:10.1117/12.839195
Text Size: A A A
From Conference Volume 7529

  • Image Quality and System Performance VII
  • Susan P. Farnand; Frans Gaykema
  • San Jose, California | January 17, 2010

abstract

The Single Stimulus (SS) method is often chosen to collect subjective data testing no-reference objective metrics, as it is straightforward to implement and well standardized. At the same time, it exhibits some drawbacks; spread between different assessors is relatively large, and the measured ratings depend on the quality range spanned by the test samples, hence the results from different experiments cannot easily be merged . The Quality Ruler (QR) method has been proposed to overcome these inconveniences. This paper compares the performance of the SS and QR method for pictures impaired by Gaussian blur. The research goal is, on one hand, to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of both methods for quality assessment and, on the other, to make quality data of blur impaired images publicly available. The obtained results show that the confidence intervals of the QR scores are narrower than those of the SS scores. This indicates that the QR method enhances consistency across assessors. Moreover, QR scores exhibit a higher linear correlation with the distortion applied. In summary, for the purpose of building datasets of subjective quality, the QR approach seems promising from the viewpoint of both consistency and repeatability.

© (2010) COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Citation

Judith Redi ; Hantao Liu ; Hani Alers ; Rodolfo Zunino and Ingrid Heynderickx
"Comparing subjective image quality measurement methods for the creation of public databases", Proc. SPIE 7529, Image Quality and System Performance VII, 752903 (January 18, 2010); doi:10.1117/12.839195; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.839195


Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this proceeding ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).

Figures

Tables

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

Advertisement
  • Don't have an account?
  • Subscribe to the SPIE Digital Library
  • Create a FREE account to sign up for Digital Library content alerts and gain access to institutional subscriptions remotely.
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this proceeding ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Chapter

Access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions and is not available as part of a personal subscription. Print or electronic versions of individual SPIE books may be purchased via SPIE.org.