Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Proceedings Article

Geometrically induced dose correction: method and performance results

[+] Author Affiliations
R. Galler, M. Krueger, M. Suelzle

EQUIcon Software GmbH Jena (Germany)

K.-H. Choi, M. Gutsch, C. Hohle

Fraunhofer Ctr. Nanoelectronic Technologies (Germany)

L. E. Ramos, U. Weidenmueller

Vistec Electron Beam GmbH (Germany)

Proc. SPIE 7985, 27th European Mask and Lithography Conference, 79850S (April 01, 2011); doi:10.1117/12.895205
Text Size: A A A
From Conference Volume 7985

  • 27th European Mask and Lithography Conference
  • Uwe F.W. Behringer
  • Dresden, Germany | January 18, 2011

abstract

For current and future semiconductor technology nodes with critical dimensions of 32 nm or below, the e-beam lithography is faced with increasing challenges to achieve a reasonable patterning of structures, especially if a process with a chemically amplified resist is used. The reasons for these limitations are the physical properties of the transfer process used to print a structure onto the resist-coated substrate, which inherently contains an unavoidable blurring of the deposited e-beam energy around the desired shape. This blurring is usually described by a so called process proximity function (PPF) and mostly approximated by a superposition of two or more Gaussian functions. The PPF includes the e-beam blur, electron forward scattering and resist effects (often described altogether by the so called alpha parameter of the PPF [K. Keil et al, "Resolution and total blur: Correlation and focus-dependencies in e-beam lithography," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 27, 2722 (2009)]) as well as the backscattering effect (often described by the so called beta parameter of the PPF). When the desired critical dimensions of structures are near or below the alpha parameter of the PPF, depending on their environment it may be just impossible to print the structures because of the vanishing image contrast. The PPF model confirms this well-known behavior but also shows ways and limits for improvements. This paper provides real pattern lithography results - comparing classical and GIDC correction - for exposures done on a Vistec SB3050DW shaped e-beam writer. A performance comparison of the GIDC method and the classical dose correction in terms of data preparation and writing time is presented.

© (2011) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Citation

R. Galler ; K.-H. Choi ; M. Gutsch ; C. Hohle ; M. Krueger, et al.
"Geometrically induced dose correction: method and performance results", Proc. SPIE 7985, 27th European Mask and Lithography Conference, 79850S (April 01, 2011); doi:10.1117/12.895205; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.895205


Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this proceeding ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).

Figures

Tables

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

Advertisement
  • Don't have an account?
  • Subscribe to the SPIE Digital Library
  • Create a FREE account to sign up for Digital Library content alerts and gain access to institutional subscriptions remotely.
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this proceeding ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Chapter

Access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions and is not available as part of a personal subscription. Print or electronic versions of individual SPIE books may be purchased via SPIE.org.