Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Proceedings Article

Infrared hyperspectral imaging Fourier transform and dispersive spectrometers: comparison of signal-to-noise-based performance

[+] Author Affiliations
Lee W. Schumann, Terrence S. Lomheim

The Aerospace Corp. (USA)

Proc. SPIE 4480, Imaging Spectrometry VII, 1 (January 21, 2002); doi:10.1117/12.453326
Text Size: A A A
From Conference Volume 4480

  • Imaging Spectrometry VII
  • Michael R. Descour; Sylvia S. Shen
  • San Diego, CA, USA | July 29, 2001

abstract

We compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) based performance of scanning dispersive and staring (Michelson interferometer based) Fourier transform spectrometer approaches to hyperspectral infrared imaging. The information collected by the focal planes of these two spectrometer types is very different. In the scanning dispersive spectrometer, the 2-D focal plane array (FPA) collects spatial information in one direction and spectral information in the other, while the second spatial dimension is swept out in time by the scanning mechanism. The Fourier transform spectrometer 2-D focal plane array acquires 2-D spatial information while the spectrum (interferogram) is swept out in time. The formation of the signal and propagation of noise from the focal plane data collection to the final hyperspectral data cube are significantly different for each type of instrument, and distinct signal and noise models apply to each. Using the noise equivalent spectral radiance (NESR)as a figure of merit, we compare the performance of the two types of instrument with the same optical system, equal spatial resolution, image area, spectral resolution, spectral span, and imaging time. Under photon noise limited conditions (for each instrument), which are made possible by the proper design of modern infrared focal plane arrays, the traditional multiplex (Fellgett) and throughput (Jacquinot) advantages associated with non-imaging Fourier transform spectrometers vanish for reasons that will be made clear in the paper. We discuss 2-D focal plane array characteristics for each instrument, such as frame rate, dynamic range, etc. and show why they are so different (by design) between these two instruments. Finally, the consequences of the signal processing requirements implied by the two instruments are summarized.

© (2002) COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Citation

Lee W. Schumann and Terrence S. Lomheim
"Infrared hyperspectral imaging Fourier transform and dispersive spectrometers: comparison of signal-to-noise-based performance", Proc. SPIE 4480, Imaging Spectrometry VII, 1 (January 21, 2002); doi:10.1117/12.453326; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.453326


Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this proceeding ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).

Figures

Tables

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

Advertisement
  • Don't have an account?
  • Subscribe to the SPIE Digital Library
  • Create a FREE account to sign up for Digital Library content alerts and gain access to institutional subscriptions remotely.
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this proceeding ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Chapter

Access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions and is not available as part of a personal subscription. Print or electronic versions of individual SPIE books may be purchased via SPIE.org.