Infrared hyperspectral imaging Fourier transform and dispersive spectrometers: comparison of signal-to-noise-based performance

Lee W. Schumann; Terrence S. Lomheim

doi:10.1117/12.453326

17 January 2002 Infrared hyperspectral imaging Fourier transform and dispersive spectrometers: comparison of signal-to-noise-based performance

Lee W. Schumann, Terrence S. Lomheim

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 4480, Imaging Spectrometry VII; (2002) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.453326
Event: International Symposium on Optical Science and Technology, 2001, San Diego, CA, United States

Abstract

We compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) based performance of scanning dispersive and staring (Michelson interferometer based) Fourier transform spectrometer approaches to hyperspectral infrared imaging. The information collected by the focal planes of these two spectrometer types is very different. In the scanning dispersive spectrometer, the 2-D focal plane array (FPA) collects spatial information in one direction and spectral information in the other, while the second spatial dimension is swept out in time by the scanning mechanism. The Fourier transform spectrometer 2-D focal plane array acquires 2-D spatial information while the spectrum (interferogram) is swept out in time. The formation of the signal and propagation of noise from the focal plane data collection to the final hyperspectral data cube are significantly different for each type of instrument, and distinct signal and noise models apply to each. Using the noise equivalent spectral radiance (NESR)as a figure of merit, we compare the performance of the two types of instrument with the same optical system, equal spatial resolution, image area, spectral resolution, spectral span, and imaging time. Under photon noise limited conditions (for each instrument), which are made possible by the proper design of modern infrared focal plane arrays, the traditional multiplex (Fellgett) and throughput (Jacquinot) advantages associated with non-imaging Fourier transform spectrometers vanish for reasons that will be made clear in the paper. We discuss 2-D focal plane array characteristics for each instrument, such as frame rate, dynamic range, etc. and show why they are so different (by design) between these two instruments. Finally, the consequences of the signal processing requirements implied by the two instruments are summarized.

Citation Download Citation

Lee W. Schumann and Terrence S. Lomheim "Infrared hyperspectral imaging Fourier transform and dispersive spectrometers: comparison of signal-to-noise-based performance", Proc. SPIE 4480, Imaging Spectrometry VII, (17 January 2002); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.453326

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available