Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Proceedings Article

Methods of digital holography: a comparison

[+] Author Affiliations
Thomas M. Kreis, Mike Adams, Werner P. O. Jueptner

Bremer Institut fuer Angewandte Strahltechnik (Germany)

Proc. SPIE 3098, Optical Inspection and Micromeasurements II, 224 (September 17, 1997); doi:10.1117/12.281164
Text Size: A A A
From Conference Volume 3098

  • Optical Inspection and Micromeasurements II
  • Christophe Gorecki
  • Munich, Germany | June 16, 1997


Optically generated holograms can be recorded on CCD-arrays if the sampling theorem is obeyed. The digitized and quantized holograms are processed digitally for the reconstruction of intensity and phase of the real or virtual image. This digital reconstruction consists in a numerical realization of the diffraction integral One approach is the Fresnel approximation employing a single Fourier transform, the other is the interpretation of the diffraction formula as a convolution integral and calculation of this convolution by a double or triple Fourier transform. In this convolution approach the impulse response of free space propagation has to be defined which is then Fourier transformed or the free space transfer function is defined immediately. Impulse response as well as transfer function can be defined exactly or in an approximated version. The main difference between the Fresnel and the convolution approach is the different size of the resulting images. Furthermore in the Fresnel case this size depends on the wavelength and the distance of the object from the CCD, in the other case it does not. In this paper consequences on the reconstructed wavefields and on the interference phase distributions of holographic interferometry are indicated and demonstrated by experimental results.

© (1997) COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.

Thomas M. Kreis ; Mike Adams and Werner P. O. Jueptner
"Methods of digital holography: a comparison", Proc. SPIE 3098, Optical Inspection and Micromeasurements II, 224 (September 17, 1997); doi:10.1117/12.281164; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.281164

Access This Article
Sign In to Access Full Content
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).



Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections


Buy this article ($18 for members, $25 for non-members).
Sign In