Comparison of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing and phase-diverse phase retrieval

Brent L. Ellerbroek; Brian J. Thelen; David J. Lee; David A. Carrara; Richard G. Paxman

doi:10.1117/12.290157

17 October 1997 Comparison of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing and phase-diverse phase retrieval

Brent L. Ellerbroek, Brian J. Thelen, David J. Lee, David A. Carrara, Richard G. Paxman

Proceedings Volume 3126, Adaptive Optics and Applications; (1997) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.290157
Event: Optical Science, Engineering and Instrumentation '97, 1997, San Diego, CA, United States

Abstract

The effect of focus anisoplanatism upon the performance of an astronomical laser guide star (LGS) adaptive optics (AO) system can in principle be reduced if the lowest order wavefront aberrations are sensed and corrected using a natural guide star (NGS). For this approach to be useful, the noise performance of the wavefront sensor (WFS) used for the NGS measurements must be optimized to enable operation with the dimmest possible source. Two candidate sensors for this application are the Shack-Hartmann sensor and “phase-diverse phase retrieval,” a comparatively novel approach in which the phase distortion is estimated from two or more well-sampled, full-aperture images of the NGS measured with known adjustments applied to the phase profile. We present analysis and simulation results on the noise-limited performance of these two methods for a sample LGS AO observing scenario. The common parameters for this comparison are the NGS signal level, the sensing wavelength, the second-order statistics of the phase distortion, and the RMS detector read noise. Free parameters for the two approaches are the Shack-Hartmann subaperture geometry, the focus biases used for the phase-diversity measurements, and the algorithms used to estimate the wavefront. We find that phase-diverse phase retrieval provides consistently superior wavefront estimation accuracy when the NGS signal level is high. For lower NGS signal levels on the order of 103 photodetection events, the Shack-Hartmann (phase diversity) approach is preferred at a RMS detector read noise level of 5 (0) electrons/pixel.

Citation Download Citation

Brent L. Ellerbroek, Brian J. Thelen, David J. Lee, David A. Carrara, and Richard G. Paxman "Comparison of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing and phase-diverse phase retrieval", Proc. SPIE 3126, Adaptive Optics and Applications, (17 October 1997); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.290157

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available