|
|
|
|
1.INTRODUCTIONImaging with hard X-rays in the energy range between 6-30 keV, is routinely carried out on millimeter sized objects with micrometer resolution at the I13L beamline. The high photon flux available at synchrotron radiation sources allow for in-situ and operando studies to be carried out with dedicated sample environments. Imaging at higher spatial resolution is achieved with a variety of microscopy methods, working either in direct or reciprocal space. While micro-tomography is well established on the I13L beamline, high-resolution experiments have seen more recent developments and are currently being explored extensively for scientific applications. Grating interferometry provides phase and small angle information with micrometer resolution, the full-field microscope provides sub-100 nm resolution over a field of view up to 100 μm and ultimate resolution and sensitivities are achieved with ptychography and Bragg CDI. Short recording times are essential for the usability of these imaging methods, especially for operando measurements. By increasing the energy bandwidth of the radiation from ‘monochromatic’ (in this case with a Si(111) crystal monochromator) with ΔE/E=10-4 to the energy bandwidth of an undulator harmonic typically increases the flux by about two orders of magnitude. The robustness of each imaging technique in regards to the increased energy bandwidth has been tested experimentally. For all methods we are aiming at achieving tomography scanning times in minutes or seconds. The beamline addresses a large user community for multi-scale and multi-modal science. User friendliness and ease for data analyses are implemented by the SAVU software pipeline [1] and in particular for ptychography by the PtyREX software [2]. Users may visit after experiments to conduct data analyses (visualisations, segmentations, measurements, etc.) at the I13 Data Beamline [3]. 2.THE BEAMLINEThe I13L beamline is located in one of Diamond’s long straight sections of the 3 GeV storage ring. The so-called ‘mini-beta’ layout permits the independent operation of the two branchlines with small gaps of the undulator sources. Each branchline is equipped with a series of slits, X-ray filters, horizontal deflecting mirrors and Si (111) monochromators. The Diamond-Manchester Imaging Branchline also operates with a multilayer monochromator, with different sets of multilayer stripes. On the Coherence Branchline the lateral coherence length can be adapted with front-end slits and a CRL focusing optic located in the first optics hutch. More details can be found elsewhere [4, 5]. 2.1Pink beam imagingThe beamline is designed for experiments requiring large lateral coherence lengths. Regarding the longitudinal coherence length (in other words the monochromaticity of the radiation) the requirements may be more relaxed for certain experimental methods. We carried out tests to examine the influence of energy bandwidth on image quality. We have explored two different broadband modalities. ‘Pink-beam’ includes few or one undulator harmonics by combining a low-pass mirror and a high-pass filter. Alternatively, moderate energy bandwidth is achieved with a multilayer monochromator. Both are briefly described in the following and the features of each are discussed. The radiation generated by an undulator source comprises a series of intensity peaks as a function of X-ray photon energy, called undulator harmonics (see figure 1, yellow line). Each harmonic typically has a bandwidth of a few percent, and the separation of the harmonics increases as energy of the electron storage ring is increased. At high-energy storage rings single harmonics can be filtered out by a band-pass using X-ray filters and a reflecting X-ray mirror [6]. The filter cancels lower photon energies, filter materials require a reasonable thermal conductivity to withstand the heat load. Typical materials used are carbon and aluminum for broadband filtering, or silver, molybdenum and palladium for selective filtering around their absorption edges. Some filters help to single out a particular harmonic with an absorption edge in the vicinity of the harmonic. Higher photon energies are rejected by a reflective mirror: for X-rays the reflective angles are shallow and the cut-off energy can be modulated by the incident angle of the X-rays onto the mirror or by the mirror coating material (typically ruthenium or platinum). Overall the method is relatively simple and efficient. The filter structure and impurity/degradation traces on the mirror combined with position instabilities are the main contributing factor to the degradation of the beam quality/coherence. Additional structures in the beam profile can be corrected while the profile itself is stable over time. 2.2Multilayer monochromatorMultilayer monochromators (MLMs) are used for other synchrotron radiation sources including wigglers and bending magnets. MLMs typically provide an energy bandwidth ΔE/E of about 10-2, which corresponds approximately to the energy bandwidth of an undulator harmonic. The multilayer consists of a system of alternating high and low refractive index materials. In general a striped structure is added to the beamprofile [7, 8]: difficult to correct when the monochromator is not stabl. The central bandpass energy can be easily selected by tuning the Bragg angle. 3.EXPERIMENTS3.1Diamond-Manchester Imaging BranchlineThe Diamond-Manchester Imaging Branchline contains three experimental setups for imaging in direct space: micro-tomography with in-line phase contrast, grating interferometry and a full-field microscope. 3.1.1Micro-tomography setupThe micro-tomography setup on the Imaging Branch is operated mostly in pink-beam mode, typically with an undulator gap down to 5 mm and a combination of 1.3 mm glassy carbon and 2-3 mm aluminum filters. When operating at higher photon energies (above 25 keV) about 100 μm steel is added to the filter stack. Structures with weak absorption contrast are enhanced by increasing the distance between sample and detector. Performing phase retrieval with the Paganin filter for example, assumes an average photon energy. A typical example for an operando experiment recorded with pink beam is shown in figure 2. The study concerns multiphase flow reactive transport processes during injection of supercritical CO2, with the aim of obtaining a better understanding of the storage of CO2 in sandstone in the presence of brine [9-13]. The study revealed new mechanisms, namely a snap-off of brine connectivity under high-loading conditions. 3.1.2Grating interferometerGrating interferometry resolves structures spatially, similar to in-line phase contrast imaging, on the micrometer scale [14, 15]. The method provides additional information channels such as phase shift and small angle scattering. The phase signal provides higher sensitivity than absorption and data can be segmented with more ease [16-19]. The small angle scattering (dark-field) signal is explored for distinguishing materials of similar refractive index but different structure on the nano and Angstrom lengthscales. While in-line phase contrast identifies defined objects, small angle scattering in general is sensitive to electronic fluctuations before the formation of a separate phase happens. This is in particular interesting when observing phase separations or the crystallization in materials and processes proceeding a phase transition. In our most recent work we studied the formation of crystals using pink beam. The requirements regarding the energy bandwidth for grating interferometry are moderate and the influence has been tested [20] using the energy spectrum as shown in figure 1. The resulting exposure times are about 5 ms and, with a single grating geometry, time-resolved data can be recorded without any additional scanning. Figure 3 shows a first result from a study of anti-solvent crystallization studies of lovastatin (in water acetone solution) with anti-solvent of water. The mixing zone is in the centre of the image, details about the geometry of the experimental setup can be found elsewhere [20]. The image series of the dark-field and also of the phase shift channel reveal the moment preceding the crystallization in a specific zone. The experiment was carried out at an average photon energy of about 19 keV, the exposure time per image was 5 ms and the whole process was recorded over 7 sec. The results are important for the pharmaceutical industry in understanding the formation of basic medication components. 3.1.3Transmission X-ray microscopeThe transmission X-ray microscope (TXM) at the I13 beamline is designed to explore spatial resolutions below 100 nm in direct space [21-23]. The X-ray microscope consists of similar elements as a visible light microscope. The condenser optic illuminates the sample and matches the numerical aperture of the objective for optimal contrast. The objective lens projects the magnified image of the sample onto the detector. Optical schemes known from visible light microscopy, such as the Zernike phase contrast, are adaptable to X-rays. For the I13 microscope a ‘beam-shaper’ is used as condenser optic [24] to achieve a field of view to about 50-100 μm side length. The beam-shaper pattern is specifically designed for a modified illumination scheme in Zernike phase contrast. The objective lenses are optimized for the energy range between 8-13 keV and their resolution limit is 60 nm. The optimal energy bandwidth for the microscope is inversely proportional to the number of zones (N) in the objective zone plate: ΔE/E~1/N. A zone plate with 500 zones should therefore have an energy bandwidth of 2x10-3. Note that the energy bandwidth of a monochromator with Si(111) crystals is typically 10-4. We examined experimentally the influence of energy bandwidth on the image quality, using different stripes of the multilayer monochromator. In figure 4, a TXM comparison between a 1% (Mo/B4C system) and 5% (Ru/B4C system) energy bandwidth is shown. For the latter the full undulator harmonic intensity is transmitted (which is typically 2-3%). For resolving 100 nm structures the energy bandwidth needs to be restricted to below 1%. The exposure times for the microscope have been reduced from minutes per projection to below one second, mainly due to the increased flux by the multilayer monochromator and the use of a Hamamatsu C12849-101U, a sCMOS camera with a 10 μm Gadox scintillation screen. The flux on the microscope can be further increased by some adaptations of the beamline optics. Tomographic scans can now be carried out within some minutes. In-situ and operando investigations can be carried out. The deterioration of photonic crystals under thermal treatment has been studied. More recently a dedicated sample environment has been developed to study the corrosion of a carbon steel in an aggressive environment, which is important for the petrol industry. Figure 4:Comparison of TXM operation using different bandpass of the monochromator’s multilayer systems. Left: Mo-B4C strip with 1% bandwidth, right Ru-B4C with 5% bandwidth. 100 nm structures are visible on the left image.  A 40 μm thick X65 steel rod was exposed over two days to a CO2 saturated emulsion at 80 °C with various flow rates, observing the development of the corroded layer (see figure 5). Figure 5:Left: TXM with dedicated sample environment, here an in-situ flow cell, to study corrosion as a function of temperature, solution chemistry, and exposure time. Right: Deterioration of a 40 μm -thick X65 steel pin in a CO2 saturated brine solution, heated at 80 oC. The formation of a oxide scale and a localized corrosion site can be observed. All images courtesy Brian Connolly, Manchester University.  3.2The Coherence BranchlineThe Coherence Branchline hosts ptychography and Bragg-CDI as the main user experiments and offers the possibility of carrying out bespoke instrumentation experiments requiring large coherence lengths. 3-D information is recoded at the nanoscale using ptychography in a similar fashion to micro-tomography, but where each projection is reconstructed from a 2D scan. As well as high resolution structural information in the transmission mode, the Bragg modalities also reveal highly sensitive strain information, where the sample is scanned around the Bragg peak. 3.2.1Ptychography and Bragg-CDIRecording ptycho-tomographic data takes currently about 10 hours, scanning the sample across a pencil beam with a rate of some tens Hz, covering an area of about 3 μm2s-1. It is also possible to perform ptychography in pink beam configuration [25-27]. For data reconstruction the energy components are multiplexed and deconvoluted into different modes [26, 28, 29]. More recently it has been demonstrated that exploiting pink beam ptychography at I13 will allow for recording speeds of 10 kHz [27]. Currently software, scanning capabilities and detectors are upgraded to explore the opportunity, and today we achieve an acquisition rate of 800 Hz in fly-scan mode, scanning 200 μm2s-1. Online and offline reconstructions are performed by PtyREX [2], the in-house developed software for ptychographic imaging taking into account the polychromaticity of the radiation spectrum and refining the sample positions in fly-scans. The most recent progress will reduce ptycho-tomography scanning times below an hour and larger amounts of samples will be scanned. We look forward to performing science on similar timescales as on the Imaging Branchline. Forimaging with Bragg-CDI, exclusively the Si (111) monochromator was used (pink-beam scheme does not apply). Typical Bragg-CDI scans vary between 5 to 20 hours of total scanning time. Figure 6 shows typical examples for research performed on batteries using ptycho-tomography and Bragg-ptychography. The left figure shows a volume rendered from ptycho-tomographic data of one of the electrodes from a Samsung S7 battery. These batteries were reported for several failures resulting in device fires and were investigated by WMG as part of a battery forensic case study. The example on the right side shows a pre-study for imaging the phase changes of a single graphite particle of a Li-Ion anode during lithium intercalation in the crystal structure. Figure 6:Examples of high-resolution tomography of battery materials. Left: Volume rendered tomo-ptychography data of a Samsung S7 battery electrode to investigate material failure (M. Loveridge, WMG, U. Warwick). Right: Reconstructed Bragg-ptychography data of a natural graphite crystal to investigate the electrode phase change by the d-spacing expansion during lithium insertion (R. Ziesche, UCL).  4.SUMMARYWe provided examples of multi-scale research at I13L with micro- and nano-resolution. When working with energy bandwidth of ΔE/E=10-2 or pink beam, the recording time is significantly reduced which is important for in-situ and operando studies. While the feasibility of imaging with extended energy bandwidth has been tested for all methods at I13L, the instrumentation on the Coherence Branch is being developed to make full use of the potential capabilities. In future we expect to provide experimental capabilities for a complementary user program across both branchlines, covering resolutions from the nano- to the micron-range for samples between 100 μm to mm size. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors especially thanks the teams of S. Schroeder (U. Leeds), M. Loveridge (Warwick Univ.), P. Shearing (UCL) and B. Connolly (Manchester Univ.) for sharing the results of their work. The Diamond-Manchester collaboration is acknowledged as well as the BP-ICAM/EPSRC Prosperity Partnership (EP/R00496X/1). The I13 team closely collaborates with C. David and Florian Döring (PSI) for X-ray optics. Kaz Wanelik, Andy Wilson and Ben Bradnick provide excellent support for beamline controls and data acquisition. Special thanks to our colleagues from the Diamond I24 beamline (R. Owen and D. Sherrell) for assistance with the scanning architecture at our beamline. The use of laboratory facilities available at the Research Complex at Harwell and with financial support from the Future Continuous Manufacturing and Advanced Crystallization (CMAC) Hub (EPSRC Grant EP/P006965/1) and for G. Das PhD studentship the University of Leeds are acknowledged. REFERENCESAtwood, R. C., Bodey, A. J., Price, S. W. T., Basham, M., and Drakopoulos, M.,
“A high-throughput system for high-quality tomographic reconstruction of large datasets at Diamond Light Source,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. A, 373
(2043), 20140398
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0398 Google Scholar
Batey, D. J.,
“PtyREX: A user-friendly software package for reconstructing ptyhcographic data recorded with electrons, X-rays and visble light,”
(in preparation), Google Scholar
Bodey, A. J., and Rau, C.,
in Journal of Physics Conference Series,
012038
(2017). Google Scholar
Rau, C., Wagner, U., Pesic, Z., and De Fanis, A.,
“Coherent imaging at the Diamond beamline I13,”
Physica Status Solidi a-Applications and Materials Science, 208
(11), 2522
–2525
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.v208.11 Google Scholar
Rau, C., Wagner, U. H., Vila-Comamala, J., Bodey, A., Parson, A., Garcia-Fernandez, M., De Fanis, A., and Pesic, Z.,
in AIP Conference Proceedings,
020047
(2016). Google Scholar
Rau, C., Weitkamp, T., Snigirev, A., Schroer, C., Benner, B., Tummler, J., Gunzler, T., Kuhlmann, M., Lengeler, B., Krill, C., Doebrich, K., Michels, D., and Michels, A.,
in Proceedings of the SPIE,
14
–22
(2002). Google Scholar
Rack, A., Morawe, C., Mancini, L., Dreossi, D., Parkinson, D. Y., Mac Dowell, A. A., Siewert, F., Rack, T., Holz, T., Kramer, M., and Dietsch, R.,
in Proceedings of SPIE,
(2014). Google Scholar
Rack, A., Vivo, A., Helfen, L., and Morawe, C.,
in AIP Conference Proceedings,
040026
(2016). Google Scholar
Andrew, M., Menke, H., Blunt, M. J., and Bijeljic, B.,
“The Imaging of Dynamic Multiphase Fluid Flow Using Synchrotron-Based X-ray Microtomography at Reservoir Conditions,”
Transport in Porous Media, 110
(1), 1
–24
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-015-0553-2 Google Scholar
Singh, K., Menke, H., Andrew, M., Lin, Q. Y., Rau, C., Blunt, M. J., and Bijeljic, B.,
“Dynamics of snap-off and pore-filling events during two-phase fluid flow in permeable media,”
Scientific Reports, 7 5192
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05204-4 Google Scholar
Menke, H. P., Andrew, M. G., Vila-Comamala, J., Rau, C., Blunt, M. J., and Bijeljic, B.,
“Dynamic Pore-scale Reservoir-condition Imaging of Reaction in Carbonates Using Synchrotron Fast Tomography,”
J. Vis. Exp.,
(120), e53763
(2017). Google Scholar
Menke, H. P., Reynolds, C. A., Andrew, M. G., Nunes, J. P. P., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J.,
“4D multi-scale imaging of reactive flow in carbonates: Assessing the impact of heterogeneity on dissolution regimes using streamlines at multiple length scales,”
Chemical Geology, 481 27
–37
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.016 Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. A., Menke, H., Andrew, M., Blunt, M. J., and Krevor, S.,
in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
8187
–8192
(2017). Google Scholar
Momose, A., Kawamoto, S., Koyama, I., Hamaishi, Y., Takai, K., and Suzuki, Y.,
“Demonstration of X-Ray Talbot interferometry,”
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics Part 2-Letters & Express Letters, 42
(7B), L866
–L868
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.42.L866 Google Scholar
Weitkamp, T., Diaz, A., David, C., Pfeiffer, F., Stampanoni, M., Cloetens, P., and Ziegler, E.,
“X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer,”
Optics Express, 13
(16), 6296
–6304
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.006296 Google Scholar
Zdora, M. C., Vila-Comamala, J., Schulz, G., Khimchenko, A., Hipp, A., Cook, A. C., Dilg, D., David, C., Grunzweig, C., Rau, C., Thibault, P., and Zanette, I.,
“X-ray phase microtomography with a single grating for high-throughput investigations of biological tissue,”
Biomedical Optics Express, 8
(2), 1257
–1270
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.001257 Google Scholar
Marathe, S., Zdora, M. C., Zanette, I., Cipiccia, S., and Rau, C.,
in Proceedings of SPIE,
(2017). Google Scholar
Bikis, C., Rodgers, G., Deyhle, H., Thalmann, P., Hipp, A., Beckmann, F., Weitkamp, T., Theocharis, S., Rau, C., Schulz, G., and Muller, B.,
“Sensitivity comparison of absorption and grating-based phase tomography of paraffin-embedded human brain tissue,”
Applied Physics Letters, 114
(8), 083702
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5085302 Google Scholar
Rodgers, G., Schulz, G., Deyhle, H., Marathe, S., Bikis, C., Weitkamp, T., and Muller, B.,
“A quantitative correction for phase wrapping artifacts in hard X-ray grating interferometry,”
Applied Physics Letters, 113
(9), 093702
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5045398 Google Scholar
Marathe, S.,
“Development of synchrotron pink beam X-ray grating interferometer for fast imaging and tomography applications,”
11113
(1111319), Google Scholar
Stampanoni, M., Mokso, R., Marone, F., Vila-Comamala, J., Gorelick, S., Trtik, P., Jefimovs, K., and David, C.,
“Phase-contrast tomography at the nanoscale using hard x rays,”
Physical Review B, 81
(14), 140105(R)
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.140105 Google Scholar
Vila-Comamala, J., Bosgra, J., Eastwood, D. S., Wagner, U., Bodey, A. J., Garcia-Fernandez, M., David, C., and Rau, C.,
in AIP Conference Proceedings,
020036
(2016). Google Scholar
Storm, M., Cipiccia, S., Marathe, S., Kuppili, V. S. C., Doring, F., David, C., and Rau, C.,
“The Diamond I13-2 Transmission X-ray Microscope: Current Status and Future Developments,”
Microscopy and Microanalysis, 24
(S2), 216
–217
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927618013430 Google Scholar
Jefimovs, K., Vila-Comamala, J., Stampanoni, M., Kaulich, B., and David, C.,
“Beam-shaping condenser lenses for full-field transmission X-ray microscopy,”
Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, 15 106
–108
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049507047711 Google Scholar
Edo, T. B., Batey, D. J., Maiden, A. M., Rau, C., Wagner, U., Pesic, Z. D., Waigh, T. A., and Rodenburg, J. M.,
“Sampling in x-ray ptychography,”
Physical Review A, 87
(5), 053850
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.053850 Google Scholar
Batey, D. J., Edo, T. B., Rau, C., Wagner, U., Pesic, Z. D., Waigh, T. A., and Rodenburg, J. M.,
“Reciprocal-space up-sampling from real-space over sampling in x-ray ptychography,”
Physical Review A, 89
(4), 043812
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.043812 Google Scholar
Cipiccia, S., Batey, D., Shi, X., Williams, S., Wanelik, K., Wilson, A., Martin, P., Scott, T., and Rau, C.,
in AIP Conference Proceedings,
050005
(2019). Google Scholar
Batey, D. J., Claus, D., and Rodenburg, J. M.,
“Information multiplexing in ptychography,”
Ultramicroscopy, 138 13
–21
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.12.003 Google Scholar
Thibault, P., and Menzel, A.,
“Reconstructing state mixtures from diffraction measurements,”
Nature, 494
(7435), 68
–71
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11806 Google Scholar
|
