|
|
1.INTRODUCTIONThe objective is to design compact and high performance spectrometers. Over the past twenty years, a very high number of different space hyperspectral imagers have been designed, developed and launched. Recently, several new compact designs based on freeform optics have been proposed in the literature. We thus considered that it was mandatory to make a survey of the already existing hyperspectral imagers and innovative freeform designs to identify the most promising solutions to increase the compactness and the performance. Some survey of hyperspectral imagers has already been done in the past [29], [30]. However, the study performed in 1993 by Herring et al., is now outdated and cannot be used to identified state of art concepts. The review presented by Kumar et al., in 2015 presents the advantages to browse all the different hyperspectral imager concepts but provide only superficial technical details that cannot be used to identify the specific designs that improve both the compactness and the image and spectral quality. We thus decided to make a survey to analyze the most recent designs with the objective to select the concepts that will provide the best compromise between the volume and the performance. We have categorized the different systems in five categories: classical prism or grating based spectrometer, Offner, Three Mirror Anastigmat (TMA) and Dyson spectrometers. For each instrument, we present the design concept and the performance. In this document, we summarize the design and the performance of a selected number of instruments. From our point of view these instruments present particularly interesting performance, overall volume or technological developments. In Section 2, we present the design and the performance of some spectrometers based on a prism disperser. First, we describe double-pass prism-based spectrometer [1] that provides spectrum over the spectral interval [400-2500 nm] and which total length is equal to 300 mm. Second, we summarize the design and the performance of the “compact hyperspectral prism spectrometer for sustainable land imaging” [3], [4]. This instrument has been designed to measure the spectrum of lands over several spectral bands covering the spectral interval [400 nm, 2.2 μm]. In section 3, we first describe some Offner spectrometers. First, we describe an optical design proposed by [8] that includes one freeform mirror. This instrument is designed to cover the spectral band 240-2500 nm with a GSD varying from 4m in the UV to 7.5 m in the SWIR and a very large FOV equal to 27 degree. Second, we present the result of a study performed by [8] focused on the possibility of improving the compactness of an Offner spectrometer by inserting freeform surfaces (including the grating surface). The proposed concept is a very compact optical system diffraction-limited over the spectral domain [200, 1900 nm] and over a 20 mm length slit. In section 4, we present the performance obtained with Three Mirror Anastigmat (TMA) spectrometers. We mainly focus on the double-pass TMA [17] that includes only one freeform optical surface and a plane grating. This instrument presents a diffraction image quality over the spectral band 420 – 1000 nm for a quite compact volume. In section 5, we present some important and recent technological developments related to compact imaging spectrometers. First, we summarize a paper that describes the capabilities of manufacturing freeform gratings using a 5 axis Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine. Finally, we present the design and performance of the space instruments “SSTL spectrometer” [7] and “MicroCarb” [28]. 2.CLASSICAL PRISM AND GRATING BASED SPECTROMETER2.1Double-pass prism-based spectrometerThis paper [1] describes the design and the performance of the double-pass prism-based spectrometer designed to provide spectrum over the spectral domain 400-2500 nm. The F-number is equal to 4.3, the GSD is equal to 5.7 m and the ground swath is equal to 2.86 km. The design comprises one fused silica prism as a dispersive element, one retro-reflecting mirror and two fused silica focal reducer lenses as shown in Figure 1. The total length of this instrument is equal to 400 mm. The magnification is equal to 0.48. The dispersion is equal to 8.2 nm/pixel. The spectrum is spread on 256 pixels. The detector is made of one thinned HgCdTe detector that comprises 1024 x 256 pixels. This detector can operate over the specified spectral interval, from 400 nm to 2.5 μm. The HgCdTe grows on CdZnTe substrate, but the CdZnTe blocks the shorter wavelength below 850 nm. The thinned HgCdTe is produced by removing of the CdZnTe substrate. We consider that the capability for one detector to cover the full specified spectral interval is very interesting. 2.2Compact Hyperspectral Prism Spectrometer (CHPS)The Compact Hyperspectral Prism Spectrometer (CHPS) [3], [4] has been developed under the NASA’s Sustainable Land Imaging-Technology (SLI-T) program. This instrument operates over the spectral domain 400-2500 nm and the design includes prisms to avoid the straylight induce by the gratings and to reduce the sensitivity of the polarization for inland and coastal water observations. This instrument provides continuous high-fidelity spectroscopic information across the solar reflected portion of the electromagnetic spectrum at the spectral sampling range from 1.3 nm/pixel to 11 nm/pixel. The CHPS volume is equal to 500x500x500 mm3 that is 30 times smaller than Landsat-8. The CHPS airborne version (CHPS-AB) provides 2.5 m GSD with 1.41 km swath at an altitude of the aircraft equal to 4 km. The CHPS space borne version will provide a GSD equal to 30 m at a spacecraft altitude equal to 704 km. The CHPS-AB dispersive elements include a curved aplanatic prism in a double-pass configuration following by one spherical mirror. Two additional fused silica elements are used as field lenses. The first field lens is located next to the slit. The second field lens is placed in front of the focal plane as shown in Figure 2. The detector format is 2k x 2k pixels with 12 μm pixel size. The dispersion of the CHSP-AB varies between 2.3 nm/2binning pixels to 21.3 nm/2binning pixels. 3.OFFNER SPECTROMETER3.1Wide field freeform Offner spectrometerThe compact spectrometer presented in [7] has been designed to provide a large field of view (27 degree) and a spectral range equal to 240-2500 nm thus covering the UV, VNIR and SWIR bands. The GSD is specified to be equal to 4 m in the VNIR and 7.5 m in the SWIR. The spectrometer is an Offner that comprises one grating, one filter, three mirrors and two folding mirrors. The spectrometer layout is presented in Figure 3. The primary mirror M1 is a freeform surface, the reflective grating (M2) is manufactured on a convex spherical surface and the tertiary mirror M3 is spherical and concave. M3 reflects the incident beam toward the filter set that is considered as the most critical part of the instrument. This filter comprises one filter for the UV band, one filter for the VNIR band and one filter for the SWIR band. These multilayer filters are used to select spectral band incident on each detector. This instrument includes folding mirrors located in front of the image plane to spatially separate the beam in the UV, VNIR and SWIR spectral bands. The beam corresponding each spectral band is focused on a detector. The pixel sizes are equal to 13.5 μm in UV-VNIR and is equal to 25 μm in the SWIR. The dispersion in the UV-VNIR (respectively in the SWIR) is close to 4 nm/pixel (respectively equal to 25 nm/pixel). The volume of the payload (telescope + spectrometer) is equal to 316 x 160 x 170 mm3. The flight altitude is equal to 30 km. 3.2Compact freeform Offner spectrometerThe paper [8] presents the advantages provided by freeform optics to reduce the volume and increase the image and spectral performance of an Offner spectrometer. The spectral domain is equal to 200-1500 nm, the beam aperture is equal to f/3.8 and the spectral dispersion is equal to 100 nm/mm. The grating density is equal to 150 line/mm and the FOV is defined by the slit length that is equal to 10 mm. The starting point is the all-spherical Offner - Chrisp spectrometer that presents a problem of astigmatism over the spectral domain [200, 500 nm]. This instrument can provide an acceptable image quality over [500 nm, 1100 nm] only. The volume of this spectrometer is equal to 530 cm3. The author shows that if we reduce the volume to 100 cm3 by keeping spherical surfaces only, the image quality is very bad and the spectrometer cannot be used. This spectrometer is optimized in a first time by changing the spherical surfaces to fourth- and sixth-order aspherical surfaces. After optimization, the spectrometer presents a better image quality over [500 nm, 1100 nm] and the volume of the spectrometer is reduced to 100 cm3. Finally, the spectrometer is optimized for freeform surfaces. The all-freeform Offner spectrometer comprises only freeform surfaces. The performance is diffraction limited over the full specified FOV and the full specified spectral domain for a volume still equal to 100 cm3 Figure 4. By keeping the same size, the design can be optimized to work at [200 nm, 1900 nm] with 10 mm slit or at [200 nm, 1500 nm] with 20 mm slit. 3.3Conical diffraction Offner hyperspectral imaging spectrometer (CDO-HIS)The paper [9] describes an Offner hyperspectral imaging spectrometer designed to observe the global ocean. This instrument includes one convex blazed grating to produce a “nearly non distortion and high spectral fidelity image”. In particular, the Offner configuration has been selected to get a compact solution with high performance and a low distortion in wide spectral band. The CDO-HIS comprises a push-broom imaging covering [400 nm, 900 nm]. The F-number is equal to 4 and the FOV is equal to 0.9 degree that is very close to the FOV of the instrument we plan to design in the framework of the CNES study. The slit width (respectively length) is equal to 0.1 mm (respectively 1 mm). The dispersion width is specified to be equal to 10.4 mm and the spectral resolution is specified to be better than 5 nm. The Keystone and Smile are specified to be lower than 0.1 pixel. The design is based on an all-spherical Offner configuration as shown in Figure 5. The mirrors are spherical and the diffraction grating is conical. The authors mention that this grating was fabricated by holographic lithography/ion-beam-etching techniques. The grating blaze angle is equal to 6.4°. The grating radius of curvature is around 50 mm with diameter of 16 mm. The grating groove shape was optimized to improve the 1st order diffraction efficiency and the broadband response. The calculation had been done through a finite element analysis of the groove profile. The grating efficiency has been measured and is higher than 0.5 over the full specified spectral band. One filter is installed in front of the detector to minimize the straylight due to the spectral order overlapping. The authors state that the theoretical system is almost diffraction limited with a very low level of distortion (less than 0.025 pixel). The spectral resolution, smile distortion and key stone distortion have been measured at three different FOVs and at different spectral lines over the specified spectral domain. The average linear dispersion is 0.0206 mm/nm. The lowest spectral resolution is equal to 4.76 nm. The smile distortion is equal to 0.28 nm or 5.6% of the pixel size. The keystone distortion is equal to 0.18 nm or 3.6% of the pixel size. 4.TMA SPECTROMETER4.1Double-pass freeform TMAThe paper [17], which is the reference document mentioned by CNES, presents a comparison of 15 different systems: one Offner design, two Schwarzschild designs, two Dyson designs and ten TMA designs. The specified spectral domain is equal to 420 – 1000 nm. The spectral dispersion is equal to 6.5 nm/pixel. The aperture is equal to f/3. The distortion is accessed by using two criteria: the smile and the keystone. The distortion is specified to be less than 20% of the pixel size, equal to 24 μm. The authors conclude that the following systems present better performance: the double-pass TMA, the Schwarzschild design and the Offner design. We propose to focus on the double pass TMA that presents the advantage of including a plane diffraction grating as represented in Figure 6. The mirrors M1 and M3 are aspherical surfaces that could be manufactured on the same substrate to simplify the assembly process and relax the tolerances. The mirror M2 is the eighth-order freeform surface described by generalized Forbes polynomials. The authors propose to place one filter in front of the detector to eliminate the unwanted light from the diffraction orders. The system volume is equal to 120 x 190 x 240 mm3. The theoretical image quality is diffraction limited and the keystone is less than 5% and the smile is less than 12% of the pixel size. 5.DYSON SPECTROMETER5.1Compact Wide Swath Imaging Spectrometer (CWIS)This paper [22] presents the compact wide swath imaging spectrometer (CWIS). The instrument is a push-broom imaging spectrometer operating over the spectral domain [380 nm, 2510 nm]. The swath is equal to 52 degree, the slit length is equal to 48 mm that covers 1600 pixels in the FOV direction. The aperture number is equal to F# = 1.8 and the specified spatial resolution is comprised between 0.3 and 20 m depending on the spectral band. The specified signal to noise ratio is higher than 2000 at wavelength equal to 450 nm. This spectrometer is a Dyson design with a volume equal to 325x150x150 mm3 and a mass less than 7 kg. The CWIS spectrometer includes one achromatic doublet made of CaF2 and Fused-silica glasses to provide acceptable performance over the full specified FOV and spectral domain. The optical design layout is presented in Figure 7. The most critical component of the spectrometer is the convex diffraction grating. The profile of the grating groove has been designed to provide a maximum grating efficiency over the full specified spectral domain. The groove profile differs significantly from the classical groove shape and requested specific manufacturing methods. This concave grating was fabricated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, using electron beam lithography technique and diamond turning, then post polishing to minimize stray light. The grating diameter is equal to 125 mm and the sag is greater than 6 mm. The theoretical efficiency is close to 0.62 at λ=1750 nm and drops to about 0.49 at the wavelength λ=2500 nm. The efficiency is lower than 0.3 at the wavelength range below 1200 nm. The image quality performance is compatible with a pixel size of 30 μm. The smile and keystone distortions are about 1% of the pixel size. 5.2LWIR DysonIn the paper [19], the authors describe one Dyson spectro imager operating in the LWIR spectral domain, from 7.8 μm to 13.4 μm. It is important to mention that this spectral domain is different from the VNIR and SWIR spectral domains specified for our study. However, we consider that the LWIR Dyson spectrometer proposed in this paper identifies interesting options to design a compact Dyson spectrograph that could be used to design a similar instrument operating in the VNIR and SWIR spectral bands. The F-number is equal to 2.5. The Dyson lens and aspherical lens are made of Zinc Selenide. The layout of the modified Dyson spectrometer is shown in Figure 8. The slit and the focal plane are located at a given distance close to the plane surface of the Dyson lens. This, in order to make sure that the slit and the Focal Plane Array can be accommodated. The air distances between the Dyson lens and the slit or the focal plane introduce some spherical aberration that degrades the performance. The authors propose two solutions to correct the spherical aberration: introducing an aspherical grating into the design or an aspherical lens in front of the spherical concave grating. The design presented in the paper includes a ZnSe aspherical lens located in front of the grating as represented in Figure 8. The spot image over the specified spectral band and over the full slit is well contained in one pixel of 40 μm. The smile and keystone are less than 2 μm. The volume of the spectrometer is equal to 130x50x50 mm3, making this solution particularly interesting for our study. 6.GRATING DEVELOPMENT6.1Concave dual-period and variable-period gratingsIn the paper [23], the authors present the performance of gratings manufactured at Durham University’s Precision Optics Laboratory by using a five-axis diamond-turning machine. This machine can manufacture i) multi-blaze structure gratings to maximize the diffraction efficiency over a larger spectral range and ii) variable spaced grooves to consider and compensate the projection effect of the grating’s lines on a curved surface. The other advantages are the possibility to manufacture large metallic objects in substrates (such as nickel) thermally stable and compatible with cryogenic operations. There are also two main limitations. The first limitation is the wearing of the diamond tip that could affect the homogeneity of the groove profile on the large surface thus impacting the grating efficiency. The second limitation is the thermal variation that could occurred during long time machining and that could induce surface errors. The diameter of the grating is equal to 40 mm. The grating groove density is equal to 100 line/mm. The grating is optimized to work at 1st diffraction order on the visible band [400 nm, 700 nm]. The resolving power is equal to 4500. The spectrometer F-number is equal to 6.6. Four freeform grating are considered in this study. The gratings are presented in Figure 9. The Grating 1 is made of Aluminum RSA 6061 with constant line frequency optimized for λ=588 nm. The Grating 2 is made of Aluminum RSA 443 and plated with NiP with a constant line frequency optimized for λ=588nm. The Grating 3 is made of RSA 443 and NiP with dual blazed structure optimized for λ=470 nm and λ=1047 nm. The Grating 4 is made of RSA43 and NiP with a variable period optimized for λ=588 nm. The maximum differentiation of the variable period is equal to 20 nm. The NiP was identified as the substrate offering the lowest roughness and the best profile quality. The NiP offers an average roughness of 2.5 nm RMS per facet. The typical groove profiles measured shows that the profile machined on NiP is sharper than RSA6061. 6.2Convex blaze gratingThis paper [25] present a specific kind of spectrometer based on an Offner configuration and that includes a multi-slit system located in an intermediate plane. The BATMAN spectrometer was developed for 3.6m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo ground base telescope. The “Smart slit” is programmable to select the section on the FOV that will be sent to the spectrometer. The spectral domain covers 400-800 nm. The central wavelength is at 580 nm. The spectrometer aperture number is equal to 4. The volume of the spectrometer is equal to 1.4 x 1.2 x 0.75 m3 and the mass is equal to 400 kg. The particularity of this instrument is that the multi-slit system is an active MOEMS component. This instrument has been designed for astronomical observations over the visible spectral band only. The proposed instrument is thus outside the scope of our study. This paper presents the development status and the performance of a convex blazed grating which is very interesting in the framework of the development of freeform compact spectrometers. The rectangular grating manufacturing realization method was firstly done on the flat substrate as shown in Figure 10. The Sol-Gel is used to replicate and transfer the shape of the original grating onto the substrate. To apply this method to the curve substrate is to use a flexible replica with an additional process of reactive ion etching as shown in Figure 11. The grating coating is protected silver from Optics BALZERS. The BATMAN has a grating size of 63.5 mm, radius of curvature of 225 mm, 5.7 degree of blaze angle and 300 line/mm. 6.3Surrey Satellite Technology (SSTL) spectrometerThe SSTL spectrometer [27] is dedicated to monitoring atmosphere chemistry by using the absorption spectra of atmospheric gas species. The spectral resolution is equal to 0.5 nm in UV and VIS bands. The spectral resolution is equal to 0.1 nm in NIR and SWIR bands. The spatial resolution is equal to 300 m with 150 km swath width. The instrument includes silicon detectors for the UV, VIS and NIR bands and uses on HgCdTe detector for the SWIR band. Two design of the spectrometer were proposed. The first spectrometer is specified for the Oxygen-A band 750 – 775 nm spectral interval (NIR band). The second spectrometer is specified for the SWIR band covering the spectral band of 2305-2385 nm. The SWIR spectrograph comprises one blazed grating used in a quasi-Littrow configuration that provides an efficiency over 50 %. The NIR spectrographs includes one immersed grating manufactured on the face of a prism as a dispersive element. The optical design layout is presented in Figure 12. The incident angle is comprised between 50 and 60 degree incidence angle in total internal reflection close to the Littrow condition that induces a high efficiency. It is worth to mention that collimator and the focusing lenses are identical in the proposed design. 6.4MicroCarbThe objective of the CNES MicroCarb Satellite [28] flight mission is to monitor the carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere. The optical system has been designed to provide spectrum over four spectral bands: 764-768 nm, 1602-1619 nm and 2037-2065 nm for carbon dioxide and 1660-1672 nm for oxygen. One additional visible camera is installed before the spectrograph to image the observed scene. The payload mass is 60 kg. The volume is 1200 x 700 x 450 mm3. The telescope and the spectrometer are all made of freeform optics. The design is presented in Figure 13. There are three freeform mirrors for the telescope and three freeform mirrors for the spectrometer. These optics have been fabricated by Safran Reosc, with a surface size that varies between 50 and 200 mm. The amplitude of the freeform surfaces is comprised between 100 and 1000 μm PTV. After manufacturing, the surface roughness is equal to 2 nm and the WFE is better than 20 nm RMS. The entrance sub-pupils are implemented to limit the field of each spectral band. In this optical system, the pupil separation prism (PSP) separates the entrance pupil into sub-pupil. Each sub-pupil will provide one beam for each spectral band. The field mask is implemented to eliminate the light from other sub-pupils. The beam from the telescope is incident on the entrance slit and the Pupil Alignment Prisms (PAP). The PAP aims to re-centering the entrance sub-pupil for each spectral band. The beam incident on the folding mirror FM1 is reflected toward the M3sp, M2sp and M1sp respectively. The M1sp reflects the beam toward the Echelle grating in near-Littrow configuration. The Echelle grating disperses the beam toward the M1sp, M2sp and M3sp respectively. The M3sp reflects the light toward the folding mirror FM2 and the detectors. 7.CONCLUSIONSIn this report, we presented the results of the review of thirty papers with the objective to identify the most promising compact spectrometer designs. We described the main characteristics of the state-of-art spectrometers optical design and we presented the technological status of freeform manufacturing capabilities. Based on the results of this survey, we decided to select three interesting systems: the Dyson optical design [22], the double-pass TMA [17] and the freeform Offner spectrometer [8]. First, we propose to study the Dyson instrument which represents the state-of-art compact spectrometer with performance in line with the need of our study. This optical configuration presents the advantage to provide good imaging performance, a wide swath and a fast aperture by using classical optical surfaces (no freeform optics). Second, we selected the double pass freeform TMA that present the advantages to use a simple plane grating and two mirrors fabricated on a common substrate. Another advantage is that the double-pass TMA includes only one freeform surface thus minimizing the risk on the manufacturing capability when compared to a full-freeform surfaces spectrometer. The first drawback is that the double-pass configuration will require more stringent requirements on the optical surface quality and on the alignment accuracy. The second drawback is that the high number of optical surfaces will reduce the throughput of the instrument. Finally, we propose to study the freeform Offner that has been identified as the most compact system proving the best image quality over a large spectral interval. However, this instrument involves three freeform surfaces, including the grating. This full freeform instrument will thus induce high manufacturing cost and a complex alignment procedure. Furthermore, the manufacturability of the grating on the freeform surface must be verified. Table 1.Trade-off and volume of freeform Offner, double-pass freeform TMA and CWIS Dyson spectrometers.
ACKNOWLEFGEMENTThis work is carried out at the Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand (public organization) in the collaboration with Institut d’Optique Graduate School and Laboratoire Huber Curien. Additional financial support for research and survey was provided by Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES). W.W. would like to express his gratitude to Development and Promotion of Science and Technology Talents Project (DPST) for the PhD scholarship at Chiang Mai University. REFERENCESTerrence S. Lomheim, Eric A. Nussbaumer, Jeffrey A. Lang, David W. Warren, and Nemesio Caraballo,
“Parametric methodologies and tools for first-order hyperspectral imaging sensor system design,”
in Proc. SPIEImaging Spectrometry,
(2004). Google Scholar
Fritz Blechinger, Bernd Harnisch, and Bernd Paul Kunkel,
“Optical concepts for high-resolution imaging spectrometers,”
in Proc. SPIEImaging Spectrometry,
(1995). Google Scholar
Thomas U. Kampe, Nathan Leisso, Robert Slusher, Paul Kaptchen, Nathan Showalter, Jerold Cole, Jonathan R. Fox, Kyle Solander, Lyle Ruppert, Rusty Schweickart, William S. Good, James Howell, Robert Warden, Frank Grochocki, James Baer, Laura Coyle, James Lasnik, Betsy Farris, and Emily Mrkvicka,
“The compact hyperspectral prism spectrometer for sustainable land imaging: enhancing capabilities for land remote sensing,”
in Proc. SPIEEarth Observing Systems XXIV,
111270W
(2019). Google Scholar
Thomas U. Kampe, William S. Good,
“Pathway to future sustainable land imaging: the compact hyperspectral prism spectrometer,”
in Proc. SPIEEarth Observing Systems XXII,
1040208
(2017). Google Scholar
Shanbing Zhu, Minxue Tang, Yiqun Ji, Guangbiao Gong, Ruirui Zhang, and Weimin Shen,
“Optical design of prism-grating-prism imaging spectrometers,”
in Proc. SPIE2008 International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology: Optical Systems and Optoelectronic Instruments,
71560L
(2009). Google Scholar
Yong-hong Qi, Bin Xue, Yi-yi Zhao, and Jin-you Tao,
“Design of camera and spectrometer dual-use system,”
in Proc. SPIEInternational Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging 2013: Imaging Spectrometer Technologies and Applications,
891014
(2013). Google Scholar
Lei Feng, Lidong Wei, Yunfeng Nie, Min Huang, Lei Yang, Xilu Fu, and Jinsong Zhou,
“Design of a compact spectrometer with large field of view based on freeform surface,”
ELSEVIER2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2019.03.064 Google Scholar
Reimers, J., Bauer, A., Thompson, K.,
“Freeform spectrometer enabling increased compactness,”
Light Sci Appl, 6 e17026
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2017.26 Google Scholar
Qiao Pan, Xinhua Chen, Jiankang Zhou, Quan Liu, Zhicheng Zhao, and Weimin Shen,
“Manufacture of the compact conical diffraction Offner hyperspectral imaging spectrometer,”
Appl. Opt., 58 7298
–7304
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.58.007298 Google Scholar
Yiqun Ji and Weimin Shen,
“Compact hyperspectral imaging system with a convex grating,”
in Proc. SPIEOptical Design and Testing III,
68340Y
(2007). Google Scholar
Guangbiao Gong, Yiquan Ji, Shanbing Zhu, Ruirui Zhang, and Weimin Shen,
“Design of an off-axis three-mirror system with high speed for hyperspectral imagers,”
in Proc. SPIE2008 International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology: Optical Systems and Optoelectronic Instruments,
71561M
(2009). Google Scholar
Quan Liu, Yiqun Ji, Jianhong Wu, and Weimin Shen,
“Study on convex grating in hyperspectral imaging spectrometers,”
in Proc. SPIEMIPPR 2009: Multispectral Image Acquisition and Processing,
74940N
(2009). Google Scholar
Thomas Peschel, Matthias Beier, Christoph Damm, Johannes Hartung, Robert Jende, Sandra Müller, Mathias Rohde, Andreas Gebhardt, Stefan Risse, Ingo Walter, Ilse Sebastian, and David Krutz,
“Integration and testing of an imaging spectrometer for earth observation,”
in Proc. SPIEInternational Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2018,
111800O
(2019). Google Scholar
T. Peschel, C. Damm, M. Beier, A. Gebhardt, S. Risse, I. Walter, I. Sebastian, and D. Krutz,
“Design of an imaging spectrometer for earth observation using freeform mirrors,”
in Proc. SPIEInternational Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2016,
1056237
(2017). Google Scholar
A. Zuccaro Marchi, L. Maresi, and M. Taccola,
“Technologies and designs for small optical missions,”
in Proc. SPIEInternational Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2018,
111801Z
(2019). Google Scholar
Stefan Kaiser, Bernhard Sang, Josef Schubert, Stefan Hofer, Timo Stuffler,
“Compact prism spectrometer of pushbroom type for hyperspectral imaging,”
in Proc. SPIEOptical Design and Engineering III,
710014
(2008). Google Scholar
Chang Liu, Christoph Straif, Thomas Flügel-Paul, Uwe D. Zeitner, and Herbert Gross,
“Comparison of hyperspectral imaging spectrometer designs and the improvement of system performance with freeform surfaces,”
Appl. Opt., 56 6894
–6901
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.006894 Google Scholar
John F. Silny and Thomas G. Chrien,
“Large format imaging spectrometers for future hyperspectral Landsat mission,”
in Proc. SPIEImaging Spectrometry XVI,
815803
(2011). Google Scholar
David W. Warren, David J. Gutierrez, Jeffrey L. Hall, and Eric R. Keim,
“Dyson spectrometers for infrared earth remote sensing,”
in Proc. SPIEInfrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing and Instrumentation XVI,
70820R
(2008). Google Scholar
Robert Lucke and John Fisher,
“The Schmidt-Dyson: a fast space-borne wide-field hyperspectral imager,”
in Proc. SPIEImaging Spectrometry XV,
78120M
(2010). Google Scholar
B. Van Gorp, P. Mouroulis, D. W. Wilson, and R. O. Green,
“Design of the Compact Wide Swath Imaging Spectrometer (CWIS),”
in Proc. SPIEImaging Spectrometry XIX,
92220C
(2014). Google Scholar
B. Van Gorp, P. Mouroulis, D. W. Wilson, R. O. Green, J. I. Rodriguez, E. Liggett, and D. R. Thompson,
“Compact Wide swath Imaging Spectrometer (CWIS): alignment and laboratory calibration,”
in Proc. SPIEImaging Spectrometry XXI,
997605
(2016). Google Scholar
Cyril Bourgenot, Ariadna Calcines, and Ray Sharples,
“New opportunities of freeform gratings using diamond machining,”
in Proc. SPIEAdvances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation III,
1070626
(2018). Google Scholar
Ariadna Calcines, Cyril Bourgenot, and Ray Sharples,
“Design of freeform diffraction gratings: performance, limitations and potential applications,”
in Proc. SPIEAdvances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation III,
107064Z
(2018). Google Scholar
Frédéric Zamkotsian, Igor Zhurminsky, Patrick Lanzoni, Nicolas Tchoubaklian, Christian Schneider, Sören Fricke, Marc Schnieper, Fabian Lütolf, Clément Luitot, and Vincent Costes,
“Convex blazed gratings for high throughput spectrographs in space missions,”
in Proc. SPIEInternational Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2018,
1118051
(2019). Google Scholar
Andrew Court, Jean Loup Bezy, Pieternel Levelt, Martin Siegl, Anton Leemhuis, Nick vd Valk, and Pepijn Veefkind,
“Compact hyperspectral instrument for NO2 remote sensing,”
in Proc. SPIESensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXII,
107850F
(2018). Google Scholar
D. R. Lobb and I. S. Bhatti,
“Applications of immersed diffraction gratings in Earth observation from space,”
in Proc. SPIEInternational Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2010,
105651M
(2017). Google Scholar
Frederick Pasternak, Philippe Bernard, Laurent Georges, and Véronique Pascal,
“The microcarb instrument,”
in Proc. SPIEInternational Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2016,
105621P
(2017). Google Scholar
Mark Herring, Thomas G. Chrien, Valerie G. Duval, and Timothy N. Krabach,
“Imaging spectrometry: concepts and system trade-offs,”
in Proc. SPIEInfrared and Millimeter-Wave Engineering,
(1993). Google Scholar
Ajay Kumar, K., Nitesh Thapa and Kuriakose, S.A.,
“Advances in spaceborne hyperspectral imaging systems,”
Current Science, 108
(5),
(2015). Google Scholar
|