Poster + Presentation + Paper
27 April 2023 Direct yield prediction from SEM images
Lilach Choona, Jasmine Linshiz, Shaul Pres, Boris Levant, Noam Tal, Gaetano Santoro, Sylvain Baudot, Ann Opdebeeck, Jason Reifsnider, Senthil Vadakupudhu Palayam, Gian Lorusso, Jerome Mitard, Shay Yogev
Author Affiliations +
Conference Poster
Abstract
In line Electrical measurement (E-Test) are the most effective predictors for EOL yield control. As technology progress with scaling, the number. of process layers increases, allowing in-line electrical measurements only after several months since lot started process in-line. As a result, each E-Test monitor controls longer and more challenging process loop. Most of the in-line pattern control that impact electrical performance measured separately for each pattern polygon and material properties. In addition, Edge Placement Error (EPE) methodology, allows combination of multiple dimensions like CD, Overlay and LER measurements to better predict yield impact. Technology shrinkage, resulting that transistor electrical performance, defined by more geomaterial parameters as well as material compositions and defectivity. In this paper we demonstrate a direct prediction from high resolution Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images to the first inline electrical measurement (M1) using Deep Learning (DL) techniques. The DL model provide early prediction of electrical performance, describing accurately Within Wafer (WIW) variation weeks earlier than the actual electrical measurements. Multiple layers prediction may indicate suspected process loop that modulate majority of variation and save time to solution. It can be achieved since the DL model utilizes complementary information exist on the full e-Beam image like materials and defectivity. The following results will indicate that accumulating information collected from several layers will improve prediction sensitivity and lead to even more accurate prediction capabilities. We assume that the effectiveness of the proposed prediction method will increase with process complexity, since the modulation of the existing yield predictors is losing sensitivity as design rule shrinks. In addition, since fabrication phase gets longer, the time to actual electrical measurements increase, making an early, nondestructive, and accurate prediction for electrical performance more and more valuable.
Conference Presentation
© (2023) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Lilach Choona, Jasmine Linshiz, Shaul Pres, Boris Levant, Noam Tal, Gaetano Santoro, Sylvain Baudot, Ann Opdebeeck, Jason Reifsnider, Senthil Vadakupudhu Palayam, Gian Lorusso, Jerome Mitard, and Shay Yogev "Direct yield prediction from SEM images", Proc. SPIE 12496, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control XXXVII, 124960Q (27 April 2023); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2658294
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Semiconducting wafers

Scanning electron microscopy

Transistors

Etching

Image processing

Deep learning

Performance modeling

Back to Top