The potential of ChatGPT as clinical diagnostician for aortic dissection

Yun Hua; Jiayu Xu; Shuying Wang; Chengliang Yin; Kunlun He

doi:10.1117/12.3036650

13 July 2024 The potential of ChatGPT as clinical diagnostician for aortic dissection

Yun Hua, Jiayu Xu, Shuying Wang, Chengliang Yin, Kunlun He

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 13208, Third International Conference on Biomedical and Intelligent Systems (IC-BIS 2024); 1320835 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3036650
Event: 3rd International Conference on Biomedical and Intelligent Systems (IC-BIS 2024), 2024, Nanchang, China

Abstract

Aortic dissection (AD), commonly known as acute aortic syndrome, which also encompasses conditions such as hematoma, aortic ulcer, and thoracic aortic aneurysm rupture, is the most frequent and devastating diseases. In this study, we evaluate ChatGPT in diagnosis AD and compare the ChatGPT-4.0 and the ChatGPT-3.5. We conducted a prospective study via public case report literature to investigate whether ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 can provide correct diagnosis based on clinical information and image feature information. The results were analyzed using commonly used statistical methods regarding different category patterns (Gender, Disease, Age, Admission_date_time Or Published_time). For primary diagnose, the accuracy rates of ChatGPT-4.0 were very higher than the ChatGPT-3.5 (0.856 vs. 0.782, p<0.05). For secondary diagnoses, the accuracy rates of ChatGPT-4.0 were also significantly higher than ChatGPT-3.5 (0.856 vs. 0.782, p<0.05). ChatGPT-3.5 has limitations in its ability for patient history, symptom presentation, laboratory tests, and imaging data. ChatGPT-4.0 has limitations in identifying symptoms and laboratory test data by classifying and analyzing misdiagnosis causes. Both for primary and secondary diagnose, there was significant difference in Gender, Disease, Age, and Admission_date_time Or Published_time group in ChatGPT-4.0 and ChatGPT-3.5 (p>0.05). Both ChatChatGPT3.5 and ChatChatGPT4.0 satisfactory for addressing fundamental inquiries related to Aortic dissection disease. ChatGPT has potential in medical diagnosis, and accuracy of ChatGPT-4.0 is better than that of ChatGPT-3.5 in the disease diagnose, but ChatGPT-4.0 still has limitations regarding patient symptoms and laboratory data recognition. Further studies which performed in the dynamic clinical practice environment is needed.

(2024) Published by SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.

Citation Download Citation

Yun Hua, Jiayu Xu, Shuying Wang, Chengliang Yin, and Kunlun He "The potential of ChatGPT as clinical diagnostician for aortic dissection", Proc. SPIE 13208, Third International Conference on Biomedical and Intelligent Systems (IC-BIS 2024), 1320835 (13 July 2024); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3036650

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
6 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Cardiovascular disorders

Diagnostics

Diseases and disorders

Medical diagnostics

Data processing

Databases

Statistical analysis

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years