PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
We compare quantitative phase-measuring techniques in ESPI, using temporal and spatial phase shifting (TPS and SPS). The latter is less susceptible to time-dependent disturbances but inherently yields higher noise in the results due to the spatial intensity and phase variations of the object speckle field. Moreover, the necessity of larger speckles limits the light efficiency in SPS. Based on an evaluation of phase errors in sawtooth images, we compare both of the methods quantitatively in various ESPI configurations. By varying quantities like speckle size and shape and sawtooth fringe density, we find out characteristic behaviors of the methods. Some strategies to optimize the accuracy of the SPS method are explored to estimate how competitive SPS can be in ESPI systems.
Jan Burke andHeinz Helmers
"Performance of spatial vs. temporal phase shifting in ESPI", Proc. SPIE 3744, Interferometry '99: Techniques and Technologies, (13 August 1999); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.357712
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Jan Burke, Heinz Helmers, "Performance of spatial vs. temporal phase shifting in ESPI," Proc. SPIE 3744, Interferometry '99: Techniques and Technologies, (13 August 1999); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.357712