Comparison of aerosol backscatter and wind field estimates from the REAL and the SAMPLE

Shane D. Mayor; Pierre Dérian; Christopher F. Mauzey; Scott M. Spuler; Patrick Ponsardin; Jeff Pruitt; Darrell Ramsey; Noah S. Higdon

doi:10.1117/12.2187538

1 September 2015 Comparison of aerosol backscatter and wind field estimates from the REAL and the SAMPLE

Shane D. Mayor, Pierre Dérian, Christopher F. Mauzey, Scott M. Spuler, Patrick Ponsardin, Jeff Pruitt, Darrell Ramsey, Noah S. Higdon

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9612, Lidar Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring XV; 96120G (2015) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2187538
Event: SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, 2015, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

Although operating at the same near-infrared 1.5- m wavelength, the Raman-shifted Eye-safe Aerosol Lidar (REAL) and the Scanning Aerosol Micro-Pulse Lidar-Eye-safe (SAMPLE) are very different in how they generate and detect laser radiation. We present results from an experiment where the REAL and the SAMPLE were operated side-by-side in Chico, California, in March of 2015. During the non-continuous, eleven day test period, the SAMPLE instrument was operated at maximum pulse repetition frequency (15 kHz) and integrated over the interpulse period of the REAL (0.1 s). Operation at the high pulse repetition frequency resulted in second trip echoes which contaminated portions of the data. The performance of the SAMPLE instrument varied with background brightness--as expected with a photon counting receiver|--yet showed equal or larger backscatter intensity signal to noise ratio throughout the intercomparison experiment. We show that a modest low-pass filter or smooth applied to the REAL raw waveforms (that have 5x higher range resolution) results in significant increases in raw signal-to-noise ratio and image signal-to-noise ratio--a measure of coherent aerosol feature content in the images resulting from the scans. Examples of wind fields and time series of wind estimates from both systems are presented. We conclude by reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of each system and sketch a plan for future research and development activities to optimize the design of future systems.

Citation Download Citation

Shane D. Mayor, Pierre Dérian, Christopher F. Mauzey, Scott M. Spuler, Patrick Ponsardin, Jeff Pruitt, Darrell Ramsey, and Noah S. Higdon "Comparison of aerosol backscatter and wind field estimates from the REAL and the SAMPLE", Proc. SPIE 9612, Lidar Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring XV, 96120G (1 September 2015); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2187538

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE