PurposeWe evaluate the impact of charge summing correction on a cadmium telluride (CdTe)-based photon-counting detector in breast computed tomography (CT). ApproachWe employ a custom-built laboratory benchtop system using the X-THOR FX30 0.75-mm CdTe detector (Varex Imaging, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States) with a pixel pitch of 0.1 mm, operated in both standard mode [single pixel (SP)] and charge summing correction mode [anticoincidence (AC)]. A tungsten anode source operated at 55 kVp with 2-mm aluminum external filtration and tube currents of 25, 100, and 200 mA with corresponding exposure times of 20, 5, and 2.5 ms were employed to study the effects of X-ray fluence and pulse pileup. Performance comparisons between AC and SP modes are performed in both projection and image reconstructed spaces. In the projection space, performance metrics include count rate, energy resolution, uniformity, modulation transfer function (MTF), and noise power spectrum (NPS). In the image space, performance metrics consist of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), uniformity, NPS, and iodine quantification accuracy. For both acquisition modes, signal-to-thickness calibration, for gain and beam hardening corrections, is used before image reconstruction. Images are reconstructed via TIGRE CT software using the standard Feldkamp, Davis, and Kress (FDK) filtered back projection algorithm with a Hann filter and reconstructed with a voxel size of 0.081 mm. Material decomposition is performed using a standard image-based method. ResultsIn the detector space, the application of hardware-based charge summing correction enhances spectral resolution and improves the spatial resolution of MTF at lower energy thresholds but introduces anomalous edge enhancement effects and artifacts in the MTF at high fluence. A negative noise correlation was observed in AC mode–acquired images. As expected, the AC acquisition mode results in a decreased detector count rate. In the image space, NPS results displayed elevated noise in low-energy AC images. However, at high energy, noise was comparable between both modes. Greater uniformity was observed in SP mode–acquired images. The largest disparity was observed in the iodine quantification test, where the AC mode demonstrates a much stronger linear relationship between estimated and true iodine concentrations than the SP mode. ConclusionThe results are specific to the studied system, reconstruction parameters, and irradiation conditions limited to 200 mA and 0.5 mAs. The AC mode generally provides better energy and MTF resolution at low energy thresholds but with increased noise and reduced uniformity. In image space, charge summing correction improved iodine quantification and CNR at high energy thresholds.
|
