Detectability of fluorescent gold nanoparticles under micro-CT and optical projection tomography imaging

Steve Kozomara; Nancy L. Ford

doi:10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.026002

6 April 2020 Detectability of fluorescent gold nanoparticles under micro-CT and optical projection tomography imaging

Steve Kozomara, Nancy L. Ford

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Medical Imaging, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 026002 (April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.026002

Abstract

Purpose: Preclinical studies often compare micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging with histology using optical microscopy of fluorescently labeled slides. However, correlating the images is difficult because the tissues appear differently in the two modalities. It would be valuable to have a single contrast medium visible on both radiographic and optical imaging.

Approach: We have explored the detectability of fluorescently labeled gold nanoparticles under micro-CT and optical projection tomography (OPT) in agarose phantoms and a murine melanoma tumor model. Murine melanoma cells were used to induce tumor growth in the right hind legs of 12 C57Bl6 mice, with the maximal tumor size of 1 cm³. We injected Cy3 fluorescently coated gold nanorods directly into the tumors. The mice were scanned with in vivo micro-CT (for pre- and post-contrast scans). Once euthanized, the hind leg was dissected and scanned with a higher resolution specimen micro-CT and OPT.

Results: The distribution of the gold nanoparticles appeared to be contained and isolated to the tumor. Alignment of micro-CT specimen scans with the OPT scans was possible, although there was also autofluorescence of the surrounding muscle tissue.

Conclusions: This study highlights the potential use of fluorescently labeled gold nanoparticles for imaging murine melanoma tumors using micro-CT and OPT.

1. Introduction

In small animal imaging for preclinical research, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) is often the imaging modality of choice, due to its high-spatial resolution, excellent sensitivity to both bone and lung, relatively short scan times, and cost-effectiveness.¹ However, solid tumors have densities similar to their surrounding soft tissues; therefore, to be able to view them using micro-CT, the use of a contrast agent is required. Tumors are often highly vascular with a vascular architecture that is dysfunctional and leads to the leakage of substances from the vascular system into the surrounding tumor. This is collectively known as the enhanced permeability and retention effect.² Using this characteristic to our advantage, and the fact that particle sizes of 200 to 300 nm can readily extravasate into the tumor tissue, nanoparticle contrast media can be used to visualize tumors on micro-CT scans.³^,⁴

The use of gold nanoparticles as a contrast agent would appear ideal, as gold has a high atomic number and high density, both of which would provide favorable x-ray attenuating properties.⁵ Gold nanoparticles are of particular interest in providing contrast for computed tomography for several reasons, including the potential for long circulation times, the ability for conjugation of various functional groups and coatings to target specific tissues, and its general stability. In addition, gold provides $\sim 2.7$ times greater contrast per unit weight than iodine, can be manufactured in different sizes and shapes, can have its surfaces modified, and is generally considered nontoxic.⁵^,⁶

While it is possible to use a contrast agent to assist in isolating and identifying tissues in computed tomography scans, these same contrast agents are not visible when attempting to view them under optical imaging. For comparison with micro-CT, a three-dimensional (3-D) optical technique is preferred, such as optical projection tomography (OPT), which reconstructs projection images around the sample similar to CT. OPT was first described by Sharpe et al. in 2002 with filter sets for fluorescent imaging with Alexa 488 and Cy3 and a bright field channel.⁷ Images of mouse embryos, including different phenotypes, were presented in that paper, but the technique was noted to be limited by penetration of the light into thicker tissues and scattering effects from the tissue.⁷

Our hypothesis is that, by using fluorescently labeled gold nanorods injected into mice, we could provide contrast for in vivo micro-CT imaging, and fluorescence for optical projection tomography imaging, enabling detection of the gold nanorods in the two imaging modalities. In this research paper, we show that fluorescently labeled gold nanoparticles can provide satisfactory contrast under micro-CT when injected directly into induced murine melanoma tumors. Using Cy3 fluorescently labeled gold nanorods, which will fluoresce at the excitation wavelengths produced by the OPT scanner, provides adequate attenuation required for micro-CT imaging and fluorescence required for visual recognition when using UV filtered light with the OPT scanner.

2. Materials

2.1.

Gold Nanoparticles

The fluorescently labeled gold nanorods (Nanopartz^® Inc., Loveland, Colorado) were $10 nm \times 40 nm$ , coated with Cy3 fluorophore ( $555 / 570 nm$ ), and suspended in a sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution. We used two concentrations of nanorods: 50 OD concentration, which had $3.15 mg Au / ml$ , and 250 OD concentration, which had $12.18 mg Au / ml$ and is the most concentrated available. Since the gold will settle to the bottom of the tube in time, we agitated the tube for 60 s on a vortex mixer, then centrifuged for 60 s at 900 rpm prior to use. Each time a sample was taken from the tube, the micropipette tip was inserted into the center of the solution and held approximately in the middle of the remaining solution to ensure reproducible results.

2.2.

Micro-Computed Tomography

All of the in vivo scans were done using an in vivo micro-CT scanner (eXplore CT 120, TriFoil Imaging, Chatsworth California) reconstructed with $50 μ m$ isotropic resolution. Images were obtained with a step-and-shoot protocol, at 80 kVp, 40 mA, with a total scan time of 8.5 min and an estimated entrance dose of $0.32 Gy / scan$ .

A specimen micro-CT machine (Scanco Medical $μ CT 100$ , SCANCO Medical AG, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) was used for all high-resolution scans. For the phantom study, images were acquired with $7.4 μ m$ isotropic resolution. For the tumor study, depending on the size of the sample, 10 to $17 μ m$ isotropic resolution was used. The imaging protocols for the specimen scanner included beam energy at 90 kVp and an intensity of $200 μ A$ , with scan times ranging from 109 to 144 min.

2.3.

Optical Projection Tomography

The Bioptonics OPT Scanner 3001M (MRC Technology, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK) was used for all OPT imaging. The light source used was filtered UV light at 545 to 610 nm wavelength to correspond with the excitation wavelength of the Cy3 fluorophore on the gold nanoparticles. Samples were adhered to the sample mount using super glue (Instant Adhesive 200, Permabond LLC, Pottstown, Pennsylvania) and submerged in a cuvette containing BABB (1-part benzyl alcohol and 2-parts benzyl benzoate) during the scan. For the phantom study, we used 1000 ms exposure time per projection and reconstructed with 8.5 to $10 μ m$ voxels. For the tumor model, we used an exposure range of 300 to 600 ms per projection and reconstructed with $20 μ m$ voxels.

3. Methods

3.1.

Agarose Phantom

A solution of 1% agarose was prepared using 0.25 g of agarose powder, dissolved in 25 ml of water, and heated using a heating element. Once dissolved, the solution was allowed to cool on a bed of ice for $\sim 15 \min$ , to the point of having thickened but still remaining relatively fluid. Using a micropipette, we added $2 μ l$ of the gold nanorods into the center of the agarose solution and allowed it to set in the refrigerator at 4°C. Once the agarose had fully set, it was trimmed to $\sim 1 {cm}^{3}$ using a standard shaving razor blade. For each concentration (50 and 250 OD) of nanorods, we prepared two agarose phantoms for analysis.

Each phantom was scanned first using the specimen micro-CT scanner, as described in Sec. 2.2. Then the agarose phantom was cleared in 100% methanol (30 ml) for a total soak time of 43 h. The methanol was replaced with fresh methanol, at time points of 2, 6, and 19 h. Then the phantom was submerged in BABB for an additional 24 h. The agarose phantom was then removed from the BABB and adhered to the specimen mount for OPT scanning, as described in Sec. 2.3.

3.2.

Animal Model

Ethics approval (A14-0125) was obtained prior to commencing with the small animal research. Twelve female nine-week-old C57Bl6 mice were purchased from Charles River (Wilmington, Massachusetts) and housed with a standard day and night cycle. The mice were fed a standard mouse diet with free access to food and water throughout the study.

B16-F10 cells were purchased from ATCC^® (CRL-6475™, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Virginia) and were grown in uncoated cell culture-grade dishes in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Cat#: ATCC-302002) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin–streptomycin (Fetal Bovine Serum, Cat#: 12484-010, Gibco™, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).

Prior to injection, the culture medium was removed, and the cell layer was rinsed with PBS (Cat#: 20012-027, Gibco™, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). We then added 1.0 ml 0.25% (w/v) trypsin-EDTA solution (Cat#: 25200-056, Gibco™, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) to detach the cells from the substrate. Cells were washed with PBS and cell numbers were counted using a hemocytometer. After spinning at $\sim 125 \times G$ for 5 min, B16-F10 cells were resuspended in PBS at a concentration of $3 \times 10^{5} cells / ml$ . Under inhaled anesthesia (2% isoflurane in $O_{2}$ ), 0.1 ml of the cell solution was injected subcutaneously into the right hind leg of each mouse, approximately at the midshaft of the femur. The mice were returned to the animal facility for approximately 3 weeks, until the tumors reached a maximum size of about $1 {cm}^{3}$ , as measured with calipers.

Once tumor growth had completed, each mouse received pre- and post-contrast micro-CT scans. Anesthesia was induced with 5% isoflurane in $O_{2}$ , and the mouse was positioned prone on the scanner bed where a nose cone was placed to maintain anesthesia using 1.5% to 2% isoflurane in $O_{2}$ . Precontrast scans were performed as described in Sec. 2.2. Without moving the mouse, the tumors were directly injected with $20 μ l$ of 250 OD Nanopartz^® gold nanorods using a 1-ml insulin needle of 29 gauge. When the injection of gold nanorods was completed, the needle was left in place for 10 s, to ensure the contrast had time to enter the tumor. A postcontrast scan was then performed.

The mice were then euthanized with inhaled 100% carbon dioxide ( ${CO}_{2}$ ). Once euthanized, the fur of the right hind leg was removed with a commercially available hair removal product (Nair^®), and the hind leg was dissected and placed in 40 ml of 10% buffered formalin for 2 days, after which it was scanned with the specimen micro-CT scanner as described in Sec. 2.2.

Once the specimen scan was complete, each hind leg was placed in 40 ml of 100% methanol, which was replaced daily for 4 days, after which it was placed in 40 ml of BABB for 2 days. Once cleared, the samples were then placed into 1% agarose, which was allowed to cool and set in the refrigerator, after which it was trimmed to ensure it would fit in the OPT cuvette. The agarose-embedded right hind leg was placed once again into 40 ml of 100% methanol for 4 days (the methanol was replaced daily) after which it was placed into 40 ml of BABB for 2 days. This was done to clear the agarose surrounding the sample. The samples were then scanned with the OPT scanner as described in Sec. 2.3.

3.3.

Measurements and Analysis

MicroView (Version ABA 2.2, Trifoil Imaging, Chatsworth, California) was used to view the pre- and post-contrast in vivo micro-CT scans. The pre- and post-contrast in vivo scans were registered using six reference points from the right hind leg of each mouse using a rigid-body registration algorithm. We also assessed and viewed the specimen micro-CT scans and OPT scans, using MicroView, with additional visualization of the scans using Amira (Version 6.0.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts).

The tumors were measured clinically with digital calipers. The clinically measured tumor size was approximated using the calipers, but as the tumors were invasive and penetrated the soft tissue, a third measurement to determine depth was not possible. However, using Eq. (1), we can estimate the volume ( $V$ ) of the tumors from the measured length ( $L$ ) and width ( $W$ ).⁸

Eq. (1)

V = \frac{W^{2} L}{2} .

Tumor volumes were measured in the in vivo micro-CT images using the advanced region of interest feature in MicroView. The software allows the user to browse through the slices of the micro-CT scan and manually outline the margins of the tumor. Then a 3-D volume representing the tumor can be created and the volume recorded.

4. Results

4.1.

Agarose Phantom

The agarose phantom results showed visibility of the gold with high-resolution micro-CT and fluorescent signal with OPT, as shown in Fig. 1. It was difficult to align the individual particles exactly, but localization of the enhanced regions was achieved. From these results, we determined that introducing the nanoparticles into a small, well-defined area would enable detection with both x-ray and optical modalities.

Fig. 1

Surface rendering of the 250 OD gold nanorods in the agarose phantom showing (a) regions with high attenuation in micro-CT at $7.4 μ m$ resolution and (b) fluorescence signal with OPT at $8.65 μ m$ resolution. Arrows show approximate location of the injection site for the nanorods.

4.2.

Animal Model

The tumor could be easily visualized in the postcontrast in vivo micro-CT scans as shown in Fig. 2. Figure 3 shows the tumor segmentation procedure, including the manual contours on a selected axial view and the 3-D region of interest resulting from the segmentation. From the 3-D regions of interest, we calculated the corresponding tumor volume. There was clearly some variability in the measured tumor volumes between the mice and between what we measured using software and estimated clinically. Some of the tumors that were measured as being quite large using the software were estimated to be much smaller using the calculated volumes from our caliper measurements. Although the mice were monitored daily and their tumor size assessed using calipers, the actual tumor sizes themselves varied considerably between the mice at the point of euthanasia. In particular, mice #1 to 3 had tumors that were much larger than the remaining mice, as shown in Table 1, which was due to the fact that these mice were allowed to grow their tumors for 3 weeks. One additional mouse (mouse #8) also exhibited larger tumors than the other mice due to the tumor growing into the muscle, which was difficult to assess in awake mice with calipers. The remaining mice were monitored until the sizes of the tumors dictated their experimental end point, as shown in Table 2. It should be noted that we were unable to visualize and assess the tumor found in mouse #11, both pre- and post-contrast administration. From the in vivo micro-CT scans, it was noted that the contrast agent was not in fact present in the tumor itself but appeared to have leaked out of the injection site and deposited in the fur of the mouse instead. This was verified because, on the in vivo scans, the contrast can be seen on the outer most surface (fur) of the right hind leg, while when viewing the specimen scan (which was taken after the fur was removed), the contrast was no longer visible. For the remaining mice, the in vivo pre- and post-contrast scans, once registered, allowed for comparison and provided evidence that indeed contrast was present. With nothing other than contrast agent being introduced into the mouse between the scans, the resulting radiopacity must be the result of the injected gold nanoparticles. Figure 4 shows isosurface renderings of the bone and gold nanoparticles for three mice, demonstrating varied results, from very little or no contrast being evident in some scans to being able to differentiate the tumor very well from the surrounding tissues in other scans.

Fig. 2

Images of gold nanorods providing contrast for in vivo micro-CT scan at $50 μ m$ resolution. (a), (c), and (e) pre-contrast and (b), (d), and (f) post-contrast injection of $20 μ l$ of gold nanorod solution of mouse #7 [(a) and (b)], #9 [(c) and (d)], and #5 [(e) and (f)]. Arrows point to tumor.

Fig. 3

(a), (c), and (e) The contours selecting the tumor, and (b), (d), and (f) the 3-D volumetric region of interest for mouse #7 [(a) and (b)], #9 [(c) and (d)], and #5 [(e) and (f)].

Table 1

Measured tumor volumes for large tumors (tumors>1 cm3); caliper measurements given as dimensions in column 3 and used to estimate the volume using Eq. (1) in column 4; image-based volume from the postcontrast in vivo micro-CT scan in column 5.

Mouse	Weight (g)	Clinically measured tumor dimensions (mm)	Estimated tumor volume (mm3)	Image-based tumor volume (mm3)
1	25.6	$13 \times 13$	1099	7575.6
2	23.2	$12 \times 12$	864	2910.7
3	23.8	$11 \times 11$	665	2555.5
8	21.8	$10 \times 10$	500	1099.0

Table 2

Measured tumor volumes for smaller tumors (tumors≤1 cm3); caliper measurements given as dimensions in column 3 and used to estimate the volume using Eq. (1) in column 4; image-based volume from the postcontrast in vivo micro-CT scan in column 5.

Mouse	Weight (g)	Clinically measured tumor dimensions (mm)	Estimated tumor volume (mm3)	Image-based tumor volume (mm3)
4	19.0	$10 \times 10$	500	605.0
5	18.7	$10 \times 10$	500	859.0
6	19.1	$9 \times 9$	365	506.8
7	18.2	$9 \times 9$	365	436.4
9	20.6	$8 \times 8$	171	404.4
10	20.4	$9 \times 9$	365	837.9
11	20.6	$8 \times 8$	171	Could not assess
12	21.3	$8 \times 8$	171	219.0

Fig. 4

Surface renderings of the bone and gold nanoparticles. (a), (c), and (e) Pre-contrast and (b), (d), and (f) post-contrast injection of mouse #7 [(a) and (b)], #9 [(c) and (d)], and #5 [(e) and (f)]. Arrows point to gold nanoparticle accumulation at the tumor site. Additional high-density regions present near the top of each pair of images are due to material in the intestinal tract.

Figure 5 shows surface renderings from the specimen micro-CT scans of the excised hind legs in (a), (d), and (g), with the corresponding OPT images showing the fluorescent signal in (b), (e), and (h) and with the tissue shown in transparent color in (c), (f), and (i). The specimen scans provided more favorable images when visualizing the contrast agent as these were taken at a higher resolution, ranging from $10 μ m$ for the smaller tumors and $17.2 μ m$ for the larger tumors. By increasing the resolution of the scan, we effectively improve the spatial and contrast resolution compared with the in vivo images, allowing for improved visualization and differentiation between the tumor and surrounding tissues.

Fig. 5

Surface renderings of the bone and gold from (a), (d), and (g) micro-CT and (b), (e), and (h) OPT images showing fluorescence, and (c), (f), and (i) with the soft tissue shown (transparent) of mouse #7 (top), #9 (middle), and #5 (bottom).

The OPT scans proved more challenging, and while the images did show fluorescence that appeared to correspond to the contrast seen in the micro-CT scans, there was an abundance of background autofluorescence from the surrounding soft tissues. While the gold particles may have been detected in the OPT images, the abundance of background fluorescence and signal made it difficult to isolate the fluorescently labeled gold nanoparticles or to co-localize with the micro-CT images.

5. Discussion

The fluorescently labeled gold nanoparticles employed in this research were intended for use in either two-dimensional (2-D) confocal or fluorescent microscopy. Our study is the first to use these fluorescently labeled nanoparticles as contrast media for micro-CT imaging and the first attempt to co-localize the particles under two different imaging modalities (optical and x-ray). The Cy3-coated gold nanorods could be visualized in the images from in vivo and postmortem micro-CT and OPT, and the tumor locations in the postmortem images were successfully co-localized, mainly using the micro-CT images for tumor delineation.

An advantage to the use of gold nanoparticles as a preclinical contrast agent is that it allows for a single bolus injection, without the need for constant rate infusion. Depending on the size and shape of the particles, including the coatings or functional groups used, long circulation times are possible.⁵ Additionally, gold as a whole is considered nontoxic and biocompatible and can be used to provide adequate contrast in micro-CT when injected directly into tumors.⁹ Several studies have looked at gold nanoparticles (both as spheres and rods) as an alternative to iodine as a preclinical CT contrast agent, and the attenuation reported has varied from 2.7 to 5.7 times that of iodine.⁶^,¹⁰ While it is known that gold nanoparticles can provide attenuation, very few studies have assessed the effect of the size of the gold nanoparticles on attenuation. Xu et al.¹¹ used gold nanoparticles of varying size and concluded that the smaller gold nanoparticles exhibited greater x-ray attenuation; however, the contrast enhancement may come at a cost of toxicity effects for the mouse.¹²

A major benefit of gold nanoparticles is the opportunity to target specific locations or receptors within the body. In vivo targeted delivery of bisphosphonate-functionalized gold nanoparticles as contrast for detection of breast cancer calcifications that would have gone unnoticed under standard mammography imaging has been reported.¹³ Popovtzer et al.¹⁴ demonstrated that, using gold nanoparticles conjugated to UM-A9 antibodies, the gold nanoparticles could accumulate in the targeted cells at a rate 5 times higher than using nontargeted gold nanoparticles or no contrast at all. By utilizing the characteristic overexpression of transferrin on tumor cells, gold nanoparticles with an antibody for transferrin could be used to target these cells specifically,¹⁵ allowing for drug delivery systems to target tumor cells specifically, or used as a radiosensitizer for elevated radiation dose enhancement.¹⁶ Hainfeld et al. studied the effect of gold nanoparticles injected intravenously in vivo using mice with terminal intracerebral gliomas. The results found that the tumors had taken up the gold nanoparticles at a rate of 19:1 versus normal brain tissue and that the resulting increase in irradiation dose was 300% higher, leading to a 50% > 1-year survival rate, compared with controls that had a 100% mortality rate.¹⁷ Other researchers have conjugated gold nanoparticles to carbohydrates, including glucose, mannose, and galactose, to target various tissues and study carbohydrate metabolic processes,¹⁸ while the conjugation of gold nanoparticles to TAT peptides (which are cell-penetrating peptides that facilitate the transfer of molecules across the cell) has also been studied, allowing specific delivery of pharmaceutical payloads in the study of HIV.¹⁹ The possibilities appear endless as the ability to conjugate virtually any functional group, including fluorophores, to gold nanoparticles, plus their characteristic small size, makes them virtually perfect as a vector.

However, challenges remain in using fluorescently labeled gold nanoparticles, including determining the concentration of particles needed to achieve adequate contrast, while not using more product than is necessary and ensuring the contrast agent is well-distributed to enable clear delineation of the tumor margins. We ran into issues with being able to standardize the size of the initial melanoma tumors. It has been reported previously that the B16-F10 murine melanoma strain grows with relatively large variability in tumor volume.²⁰^–²² Adding to the difficulties of working with live mice, being able to accurately measure an invasive tumor clinically using calipers was more of a challenge than initially anticipated, and some of the initial tumors were very large as compared with latter ones. The caliper measurements were not able to accurately detect the tumor depth, leading to substantial discrepancies between the image-based measurements of tumor volume and those calculated using the caliper measurements. In some of the mice, the tumors penetrated deeper into the muscle, which would go unmeasured by the caliper method.

By performing surface rendering in the in vivo images, we were able to clearly identify the tumor periphery in several mice (Fig. 4). The oval or circular shape of the melanoma tumor is common in the early growth stages of soft tissue tumors, and the contrast present in the in vivo scans correlated well with the higher resolution scans from the specimen scanner. However, a curious finding was in the dispersion of the gold nanoparticles. Some of the mice clearly showed a more uniform and rapid dispersion of contrast, while in others it seemed to pool and localize at the site of injection. It is possible that if we would have allowed additional time between the injection and the in vivo micro-CT scan, a more uniform dispersion of the nanoparticles may have been achieved.² Tumors, particularly benign but also metastatic tumors in the early stages, are surrounded by a fibrous, connective tissue capsule that retains the tumor cells, which may also retain the gold nanoparticles.²³^,²⁴ The distribution of the particles, along with the limitations of the penetration of light into tissue, meant that the tumors were much easier to delineate in the micro-CT images than in the OPT images. Other researchers have recently reported their methods of simultaneous imaging using a micro-CT scanner with an added optical sensor to detect nanocrystals developed in their lab in a mouse tumor model.²⁵ Using simultaneous image acquisition, the anatomy was registered between the modalities, but the tumor location was only well-defined in the micro-CT images, similar to our results, due to limitations in optical imaging of tissues, such as scatter and limited penetration depth.²⁵ These researchers suggest that their simultaneous acquisition approach represents an improvement over sequential acquisitions for the different modalities by eliminating movement between the images.²⁵

The main purpose of this paper was to be able to detect the fluorescent gold nanoparticles in the images obtained from micro-CT and OPT. Using a fluorescently labeled contrast agent, additional preparation and/or staining would not be required to view the same contrast agent in OPT as in micro-CT. In the OPT images, the soft tissue surrounding the tumors (muscle tissue fiber) seemed to provide an autofluorescence signal with the same wavelength range as the fluorescent label, which we believe may be related to the fixation process. Biogenic amines will react with formaldehyde to produce compounds with a maximum emission of 480 nm.²⁶ Additionally, there have been reports of autofluorescence due specifically to the use of aldehydes as fixatives; to reduce the autofluorescent signal, it has been suggested to use a sodium borohydride bath after fixation, or avoid aldehyde fixatives altogether.²⁷ Alternative fixatives include those based on alcohols (mixtures of methanol, ethanol, and propanol) or simply minimizing the percentage of aldehydes in the fixative agent.²⁸ While we were able to achieve detection of the gold nanoparticles using both micro-CT and OPT imaging, it was clear that the autofluorescence of the muscle tissue interfered with the interpretation and correlation of the results.²⁹ For future studies, it may be advantageous to consider using different fluorescent labels on the gold nanoparticles, which may enable better separation of the nanoparticle fluorescence signal from the background tissue autofluorescence. In addition, an alcohol-based fixation method would also be beneficial.

6. Conclusions

The use of a Cy3 fluorescently labeled gold nanorod contrast agent to visualize tumors using both micro-CT and OPT imaging proved successful. The innovation of this project was the use of a Cy3 fluorescently labeled gold nanoparticle, which was intended for 2-D microscopy, to provide contrast in 3-D x-ray imaging. We demonstrated that the gold particles were observed in both the micro-CT and OPT images using an agarose phantom. Using a tumor model, we could use in vivo micro-CT imaging to visualize the gold nanoparticles, while using the specimen scanner allowed for a much better and higher resolution image, detailing exactly where the contrast agent was present in the excised hind leg. While OPT presented with its own set of challenges, the images did provide some level of fluorescence, and we were able to detect the tumor in both the OPT and micro-CT images.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge funding from NSERC RGPIN-2016-03749 and a UBC Faculty of Dentistry Pilot Project Award (2016). Micro-CT and OPT imaging were performed at the UBC Centre for High-Throughput Phenogenomics, a facility supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, British Columbia Knowledge Development Foundation, and the UBC Faculty of Dentistry. Technical assistance for cell culturing, micro-CT, and OPT imaging was provided by Dr. Guobin Sun. Preliminary results of this study were presented at the 2019 SPIE Medical Imaging conference and published in the proceedings (Volume 1095313).

References

1.

H. Li et al., “Micro-computed tomography for small animal imaging: technological details,” Prog. Nat. Sci., 18 (5), 513 –521 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.01.002 Google Scholar

2.

H. Maeda et al., “Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review,” J. Control Rel., 65 (1–2), 271 –284 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00248-5 Google Scholar

3.

J. R. Ashton, J. L. West and C. T. Badea, “In vivo small animal micro-CT using nanoparticle contrast agents,” Front. Pharmacol., 6 256 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2015.00256 Google Scholar

4.

F. Hallouard et al., “Iodinated blood pool contrast media for preclinical x-ray imaging applications—a review,” Biomaterials, 31 (24), 6249 –6268 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.066 BIMADU 0142-9612 Google Scholar

5.

H. Lusic and M. W. Grinstaff, “X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents,” Chem. Rev., 113 (3), 1641 –1666 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200358s CHREAY 0009-2665 Google Scholar

6.

J. F. Hainfeld et al., “Gold nanoparticles: a new x-ray contrast agent,” Br. J. Radiol., 79 (939), 248 –253 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/13169882 BJRAAP 0007-1285 Google Scholar

7.

J. Sharpe et al., “Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies,” Science, 296 (5567), 541 –545 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068206 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

8.

A. Faustino-Rocha et al., “Estimation of rat mammary tumor volume using caliper and ultrasonography measurements,” Lab. Anim., 42 (6), 217 –224 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.254 Google Scholar

9.

G. von Maltzahn et al., “Computationally guided photothermal tumor therapy using long-circulating gold nanorod antennas,” Cancer Res., 69 (9), 3892 –3900 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4242 Google Scholar

10.

D. Kim et al., “Antibiofouling polymer-coated gold nanoparticles as a contrast agent for in vivo x-ray computed tomography imaging,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129 (24), 7661 –7665 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja071471p JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar

11.

C. J. Xu, G. A. Tung and S. H. Sun, “Size and concentration effect of gold nanoparticles on x-ray attenuation as measured on computed tomography,” Chem. Mater., 20 (13), 4167 –4169 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm8008418 CMATEX 0897-4756 Google Scholar

12.

Y. S. Chen et al., “Assessment of the in vivo toxicity of gold nanoparticles,” Nanoscale Res. Lett., 4 (8), 858 –864 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-009-9334-6 NRLAAD 1556-276X Google Scholar

13.

L. E. Cole, T. Vargo-Gogola and R. K. Roeder, “Contrast-enhanced x-ray detection of breast microcalcifications in a murine model using targeted gold nanoparticles,” ACS Nano, 8 (7), 7486 –7496 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn5027802 ANCAC3 1936-0851 Google Scholar

14.

R. Popovtzer et al., “Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer,” Nano Lett., 8 (12), 4593 –4596 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl8029114 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

15.

E. Ryschich et al., “Transferrin receptor is a marker of malignant phenotype in human pancreatic cancer and in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas,” Eur. J. Cancer, 40 (9), 1418 –1422 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.01.036 EJCAEL 0959-8049 Google Scholar

16.

S. W. Botchway, J. A. Coulter and F. J. Currell, “Imaging intracellular and systemic in vivo gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy,” Br. J. Radiol., 88 (1054), 20150170 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150170 BJRAAP 0007-1285 Google Scholar

17.

J. F. Hainfeld et al., “Gold nanoparticle imaging and radiotherapy of brain tumors in mice,” Nanomedicine (London), 8 (10), 1601 –1609 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.12.165 Google Scholar

18.

J. M. de la Fuente and S. Penades, “Glyconanoparticles: types, synthesis and applications in glycoscience, biomedicine and material science,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1760 (4), 636 –651 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.12.001 BBACAQ 0006-3002 Google Scholar

19.

J. M. de la Fuente and C. C. Berry, “Tat peptide as an efficient molecule to translocate gold nanoparticles into the cell nucleus,” Bioconjug. Chem., 16 (5), 1176 –1180 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/bc050033+ BCCHES 1043-1802 Google Scholar

20.

W. K. Foster and N. L. Ford, “Investigating the effect of longitudinal micro-CT imaging on tumour growth in mice,” Phys. Med. Biol., 56 (2), 315 –326 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/2/002 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

21.

N. Q. Nguyen et al., “Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis establishment by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer delivery of the antiangiogenic factor 16K hPRL,” Mol. Ther., 15 (12), 2094 –2100 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mt.6300294 Google Scholar

22.

C. Danciu et al., “Behaviour of four different B16 murine melanoma cell sublines: C57BL/6J skin,” Int. J. Exp. Pathol., 96 (2), 73 –80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/iep.2015.96.issue-2 IJEPEI 1365-2613 Google Scholar

23.

H. Lodish et al., Molecular Cell Biology, WH Freeman, New York (2000). Google Scholar

24.

L. C. Barr, “The encapsulation of tumours,” Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 7 (3), 277 –282 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01753680 CEXMD2 0262-0898 Google Scholar

25.

Q. Ju et al., “Single-irradiation simultaneous dual-modal bioimaging using nanostructure scintillators as single contrast agent,” Adv. Healthcare Mater., 8 (9), 1801324 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801324 Google Scholar

26.

H. U. Dodt et al., “Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain,” Nat. Methods, 4 (4), 331 –336 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1036 1548-7091 Google Scholar

27.

W. Beisker, F. Dolbeare and J. W. Gray, “An improved immunocytochemical procedure for high-sensitivity detection of incorporated bromodeoxyuridine,” Cytometry, 8 (2), 235 –239 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990080218 CYTODQ 0196-4763 Google Scholar

28.

F. Tokumasu and J. Dvorak, “Development and application of quantum dots for immunocytochemistry of human erythrocytes,” J. Microsc., 211 (Pt. 3), 256 –261 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01219.x JMICAR 0022-2720 Google Scholar

29.

D. R. Dunn and R. F. Barth, “Identification of melanoma cells by formaldehyde-induced fluorescence,” Cancer, 33 (3), 701 –706 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197403)33:3<701::aid-cncr2820330314>3.0.co;2-o CANCAR 0008-543X Google Scholar

Biography

Stevo Kozomara is a board-certified periodontist, working in private practice in Ontario, Canada. He completed this research during his MSc in craniofacial sciences and diploma in periodontics at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Nancy L. Ford is an associate professor in the Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences and the director of the UBC Centre for High-Throughput Phenogenomics. She is an associate member in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of British Columbia. She holds a PhD in medical biophysics from the University of Western Ontario. Her research interests include preclinical micro-CT and synchrotron imaging and clinical CBCT for medical and dental applications.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.

Citation Download Citation

Steve Kozomara and Nancy L. Ford "Detectability of fluorescent gold nanoparticles under micro-CT and optical projection tomography imaging," Journal of Medical Imaging 7(2), 026002 (6 April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.026002

Received: 20 September 2019; Accepted: 23 March 2020; Published: 6 April 2020

Access the abstract

JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

CITATIONS

Cited by 3 scholarly publications.

Explore citations on Lens.org

KEYWORDS

Tumors

Gold

Nanoparticles

In vivo imaging

Tissues

Nanorods

Tomography

1.

Introduction

2.

Materials

2.1.

Gold Nanoparticles

2.2.

Micro-Computed Tomography

2.3.

Optical Projection Tomography

3.

Methods

3.1.

Agarose Phantom

3.2.

Animal Model

3.3.

Measurements and Analysis

Eq. (1)

4.

Results

4.1.

Agarose Phantom

Fig. 1

4.2.

Animal Model

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

5.

Discussion

6.

Conclusions

Disclosures

Acknowledgments

References

Biography

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years