|
1.IntroductionOptical coherence tomography (OCT) has been one of the hot research topics in the last few years and has become one of the promising biomedical solutions as related techniques being improved.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Compared to conventional methods, OCT is capable of cross-sectional imaging of biological tissues or even organs at micrometer-scale resolution. In general, the OCT technique can be achieved in either time-domain (TD-OCT), utilizing scanning time delay lines, or frequency-domain (FD-OCT), scanning the spectrum of the light source itself. As one of the key components of TD-OCT systems, scanning delay lines should have several desired features, especially the high scanning speed and large generated delay range. Although various schemes of scanning delay lines have been demonstrated in research labs,9, 10, 11 unfortunately, it is difficult in practice to generate a large delay change while keeping the delay variation speed sufficiently high and without sacrificing the reliability. In this paper, we demonstrate an improved scanning delay line using fiber-stretching technology. Through special and optimized design of the mechanical body and the stretching mechanism, both the scanning speed and the generated delay range are significantly increased. An delay at is achieved with superior reliability (for practical purposes). This improved design with large scanning range and high speed is further verified in a dental OCT setup. 2.Improved Fiber Stretcher DesignSeveral problems existed in previous and available fiber-stretcher designs: (i) unsatisfied reliability, especially the repeatability, and (ii) generating limited delay range, typically several millimeters (e.g., ). To solve these problems, we specially design a new fiber stretcher as shown in Fig. 1, with several highlighted features: (i) two piezo-electric actuators (PZTs) are used to provide longitudinal stretch on the mechanical frame (used to hold optical fibers); (ii) the mechanical frame is optimized to match the resonance behavior of the PZTs, hence, capable of providing high-speed stretching; and (iii) special procedures are used to secure the optical fibers winding on the frame, such as fiber gluing, to improve the reliability and repeatability. The intrinsic loss of such a module can be as low as if the optical connector losses are neglected ( with connectors). 3.Results and DiscussionOn the basis of this new design, we test the generated delay versus driving frequency using the Mach–Zehnder interferometer configuration (not shown here, as can be found in various fundamental literature). The delay is calculated by counting the interference fringes through a frequency counter. Each interference fringe corresponds to a delay variation of a center wavelength ( light source is used). Assuming that the frequencies of the interference signal and the reference signal are and , respectively, the delay range can be calculated as . Figure 2 shows measurement results with a driving voltage of only . At the resonant frequency of the new fiber stretcher (i.e., , which though, can also be tuned to slightly above ), the generated delay can be as high as (corresponding to a scan speed of ). There are also some peaks with less generated delay at other frequencies (e.g., and ), where the delay is typically limited by the electronic driving circuits. Furthermore, we evaluate the reliability (repeatability) of this new module driven at the resonant frequency (i.e., ). The results are shown in Fig. 3. Ten independent trails are taken in several days under the same measurement environment (e.g., the driving voltage and frequency), and the almost overlapping traces in Fig. 3 indicate a promising repeatability in terms of delay versus frequency: the delay variation around the resonant frequency is very small and the window of the resonant frequency is not a narrow one . The superior repeatability can guarantee reliable OCT scanning results, while the frequency window can release the requirements for the accuracy and stability of the driving frequency. Both advantages are desired features for practical applications. As such a fast scanning delay line is ideal for OCT applications (e.g., dental or eye diagnosis), where a large delay scanned at high frequencies is generally required, we build a simple dental OCT setup (1-D only) to verify the improved design (Fig. 4). Again, the fiber stretcher is driven at . A tooth sample is scanned in one direction using a probe, and the interference output is detected through a fast photodetector [InGaAs PIN type]. The detection circuit includes a transimpedence amplifier and a demodulation circuit. A data acquisition (DAQ) card is used to capture instantaneous voltages (converted from intensities of optical signals) to construct images. The typical result is shown in Fig. 5. Two different positions [Fig. 5a and 5b] of a tooth sample are measured and processed as the probe scanning the sample along the horizontal direction. We can clearly see the profile of the tooth, even at the sharp edge. Note that the picture is symmetric because of the scanning itself, which is not eliminated in our software. Here although we optimize the design to have such characteristics, it is still possible to further increase the delay range, as well as the resonant frequency, through more rigorous, and also more time- and cost-consuming engineering designs. 4.ConclusionWe improved the current fiber-stretcher design to significantly increase both the scanning speed and the delay range and further verified the module in a dental OCT setup. Such a module can be used as an essential part for TD-OCT applications, as well as other possible ones (e.g., microwave photonics networks12). AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Karen Li and Peter Betts at General Photonics Corp. for help with the design and measurements. ReferencesD. Huang,
E. A. Swanson,
C. P. Lin,
J. S. Schuman,
W. G. Stinson,
W. Chang,
M. Hee,
R. T. Flotte,
K. Gregory,
C. A. Puliafito, and
J. G. Fujimoto,
“Optical coherence tomography,”
Science, 254 1178
–1181
(1991). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1957169 0036-8075 Google Scholar
Z. Yaqoob,
J. Fingler,
X. Heng, and
C. H. Yang,
“Homodyne en face optical coherence tomography,”
Opt. Lett., 31
(12), 1815
–1817
(2006). 0146-9592 Google Scholar
J. E. Roth,
J. A. Kozak,
S. Yazdanfar,
A. M. Rollins, and
J. A. Izatt,
“Simplified method for polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,”
Opt. Lett., 26
(14), 1069
–1071
(2001). 0146-9592 Google Scholar
W. Y. Oh,
B. E. Bouma,
N. Iftimia,
R. Yelin, and
G. J. Tearney,
“Spectrally-modulated full-field optical coherence microscopy for ultrahigh-resolution endoscopic imaging,”
Opt. Express, 14
(19), 8675
–8684
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.008675 1094-4087 Google Scholar
J. M. Schmitt,
“Optical coherence tomography (OCT): A review,”
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 5
(4), 1205
–1215
(1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/2944.796348 1077-260X Google Scholar
S. Guo,
J. Zhang,
L. Wang,
J. Nelson, and
Z. Chen,
“Depth-resolved birefringence and differential optical axis orientation measurements with fiber-based polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,”
Opt. Lett., 29 2025
–2027
(2004). 0146-9592 Google Scholar
M. Choma,
M. Sarunic,
C. Yang, and
J. Izatt,
“Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography,”
Opt. Express, 11
(8), 2183
–2189
(2003). 1094-4087 Google Scholar
R. Leitgeb,
C. K. Hitzenberger, and
A. F. Fercher,
“Performance of Fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography,”
Opt. Express, 11 889
–894
(2003). 1094-4087 Google Scholar
C. C. Rosa,
J. Rogers, and
A. G. Podoleanu,
“Fast scanning transmissive delay line for optical coherence tomography,”
Opt. Lett., 30 3263
–3265
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.30.003263 0146-9592 Google Scholar
G. J. Tearney,
B. E. Bouma, and
J. G. Fujimoto,
“High-speed phase- and group-delay scanning with a grating-based phase control delay line,”
Opt. Lett., 22 1811
–1813
(1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.001811 0146-9592 Google Scholar
X. Liu,
M. J. Gobb, and
X. Li,
“Rapid scanning all-reflective optical delay line for real-time optical coherence tomography,”
Opt. Lett., 29 80
–82
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.000080 0146-9592 Google Scholar
|