Extending extreme ultraviolet (EUV) single exposure patterning to its limits requires more than photoresist development. The hardmask film is a key contributor in the patterning stack that offers opportunities to enhance lithographic process window, increase pattern transfer efficiency, and decrease defectivity when utilizing very thin film stacks. This paper introduces the development of amorphous silicon (a-Si) deposited through physical vapor deposited (PVD) as an alternative to a silicon ARC (SiARC) or silicon-oxide-type EUV hardmasks in a typical trilayer patterning scheme. PVD offers benefits such as lower deposition temperature, and higher purity, compared to conventional chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques. In this work, sub-36nm pitch line-space features were resolved with a positive-tone organic chemically-amplified resist directly patterned on PVD a-Si, without an adhesion promotion layer and without pattern collapse. Pattern transfer into the underlying hardmask stack was demonstrated, allowing an evaluation of patterning metrics related to resolution, pattern transfer fidelity, and film defectivity for PVD a-Si compared to a conventional tri-layer patterning scheme. Etch selectivity and the scalability of PVD a-Si to reduce the aspect ratio of the patterning stack will also be discussed.
Current flash memory technology is facing more and more challenges for 45nm and 32nm node technology. To get good
CD and yield control, optimized RET, OPC modeling and DFM techniques have to be applied [1]. To enhance process
window (PW) and better CD control for main features, assist features (SB) have to be used. Simulation and wafer
evaluation show that the SB CD performance is very critical. Based on OPC simulation, we can get a very good
prediction about the CD size and placement of assist features. However, we can not always get what we want from mask
suppliers. For 45nm node technology and beyond, The SB CD size (~ 20nm at 1X) has almost pushed to the current
mask process limit. Wafer fabs have a very big concern about the stability of linearity signatures from different
suppliers and different products in order to keep high accuracy of OPC models. Actually the CD linearity signature
varies from one mask supplier to another and also varies from product to product. To improve the SB CD control, the
ideal goal is to make "flat" linearity for all mask suppliers. By working closely with TPI mask supplier, we come up
solutions to improve SB CD control to get "flat" linearity. Also technology development is causing more severe SB
printability, we proposed a methodology to use AIMS for predicting SB printability. Wafer results proved the feasibility
for these methodologies.
Several haze studies were conducted in a test environment where UV lamps and test chambers were used to simulate a wafer fab environment. This study was designed to investigate reticles experiencing different cleaning processes in a real wafer production environment. A split test was carried out to benchmark two different fabs: an 8" R & D fab and an 8" memory production fab. Reticles cleaned with UV treatment and hot DI water were exposed on ArF scanners for up to 80 hours over a period of two months. Starlight inspection before and after laser exposure confirmed no significant defect count increase after exposure. Ion chromatography (IC) results from masks cleaned on a new Steag MaskTrack cleaner suggest that hydrogenated water (H2-H2O) and ozonated water (O3-H2O) processes can further reduce the sulfate and ammonium ion residual count by 40%. UV + hot water cleaning also shows advantages in phase and transmission preservation where less than a 0.2 degree phase angle loss per clean can be achieved.
DUV lithography induced sub-pellicle particle formation continues to be a significant problem in semiconductor fabs. We have previously reported on the identification of various defects detected on reticles after extended use. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of various molecular contaminants found on the backside surface of a reticle used in high-volume production. Previously all or most of the photo-induced contaminants were detected under the pellicle. This particular contamination is a white “haze” detected by pre-exposure inspection using KLA-Tencor TeraStar STARlight with Un-patterned Reticle Surface Analysis, (URSA). Chemical analysis was done using Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (ToF-SIMS) and Raman spectroscopy.
Repair and printability of 193nm alternating aperture phase shift masks have been studied in detail in an effort to understand the overall production capability of these masks for wafer production at the 100nm node and below.
Sub-wavelength lithography requires knowledgeable application of resolution enhancement techniques (RETs) such as optical proximity correction (OPC) and phase shift mask (PSM). Use of RETs, in turn, requires that new photomask specifications and special requirements for mask defect printability be taken into consideration. This is especially true, as the photomask's critical dimensions become more aggressive (400 nm moving toward 300 nm). Traditionally, mask defect analysis and subsequent defect disposition has been accomplished by first performing automated reticle inspection, and then by visual inspection ultimately dependent on operator judgement. As the semiconductor industry moves to more challenging process generations this methodology is no longer viable for assessing the impact of a defect on the printed wafer. New techniques for more accurate, production-worthy defect printability analysis and defect disposition procedures are required. Developed at Numerical Technologies, Inc. is the Virtual StepperTM System that offers a fast, accurate software solution for defect printability analysis based on state-of- the-art lithography simulation techniques for advanced masks production using OPC and PSM. The newly developed Virtual Stepper System feature, Automatic Defect Severity Scoring (ADSS) provides fully automated and accurate defect impact analysis capability by calculating a consistent Defect Severity Score (DSS) for each defect detected by an inspection tool. DSS is an overall score that quantifies the impact of a given defect on surrounding features and can be used as a comprehensive indicator of defect printability. Taken into consideration, are not only printing defects, but defects which cause critical dimension (CD) errors altering a given process window.
As Optical Proximity Correction (OPC0 and Phase Shifting (PSM) become more and more commonly used for producing smaller features on wafer, the photomask (reticle) manufacturing, that is mask writing, inspection and repairing, and quality assurance become more challenging for both mask shops and wafer fabs. Consequently, a powerful defect analysis tool is needed to determine which defect is a nuisance defect, which defect needs to be repaired, and how good is the repair. It should have the capability for defect printability prediction and analysis of defect impact on device performance. In this paper, we will study and characterize the printability prediction of programmed defects on binary OPC masks by the Virtual Stepper System with its newly developed Automated Defect Severity Scoring (ADSS) function. AMD's defect test reticles HellOPC2 were used. The Virtual Stepper simulation and defect impact analysis results (the automatically calculated Defect Severity Score) will be compared to the SEM images and measurements of wafer prints using 193nm lithography. The results demonstrate that the Virtual Stepper System with its ADSS feature can provide its user with an automate, fast and accurate way of analyzing the impact of a defect. The Virtual Stepper System with ADSS function will be a suitable tool for photomask defect critically assessment in mask shops and wafer fabs.
As reticle enhancement techniques (OPC, PSM) become more commonly used in multi-masking levels for 130nm node and below, the need for a better and more precise reticle specification will be even greater. OPC and sub-nominal assist feature like scattering bar represent a challenge for mask metrology tools. Consequentiy, defect inspection for advanced reticles has become a gating step for both Mask shops and Wafer Fabs alike. In this paper, a binary defect test reticle with and without OPC/SB features, manufactured by Dupont Photomask’s Reticle Technology Center, was used for the study. The reticle was made using the ALTA 3500 Laser Writer Tool and dry chrome etch process. Reticle inspection results from KLA363UV for 0. 13 um design rule patterns in both Clear and Dark polarities, with bump, divot and pinhole programmed defects between 0.1 and 0.6 um sizes (at 4x) were shown. These results were then compared to the wafer printability using ArF 193nm lithography. The impact of each defect type on 0.13 um Isolated, Semi-Dense and Dense lines was evaluated for 10% CD tolerance to provide an assessment on the KLA363UV inspection tool capability. A set of edge defects (bump and divot) and point defect (hole between line ends) from 0.1 to 0.6 um on the reticle (4x) were repaired using the Seiko SIR-3xxx tool at DPI-RTC. The printability of repairs on wafer at 193nm exposure wavelength was evaluated. CD of repaired features was compared to that of nominal feature for both reticle and resist wafer to evaluate the repair effectiveness. Finally, a defect specification for 0.13 um design rule binary reticle using ArF lithography is discussed.
As lithographic technology nodes advance beyond the 193 nm generation, the optical absorption of organic materials will require the use of thin layer imaging (TLI) techniques. Of the techniques under consideration, the use of ultra-thin resist (UTR) over a hardmask is the most desirable because of its simplicity and close similarity to standard single layer resist processes. Prior work has demonstrated that the UTR process is capable of pattern transfer to poly silicon device layers with as little as 1000 Angstrom of resist on flat wafers using 248 nm lithography. This was achieved with defect levels comparable to a conventional 5000 Angstrom resist process. In this work, we demonstrate 'proof of concept' by integrating the UTR process into the transistor gate module of a production device using 248 nm lithography. In doing so we focus on three key areas for manufacturability: inherent defectivity of UTR films, sensitivity of thin resist to topography, and quality of pattern transfer. We find that pinhole defects are of little concern in the UTR process after SEM review of defects on un-patterned UTR films. We show that the UTR process is sensitive to wafer topography, since it does not provide a completely planar surface over the underlying device features. Finally, we demonstrate that the UTR process is capable of reliable pattern transfer on a production device with defect levels comparable to the thicker baseline single layer resist process.
With the rapid advances of deep submicron semiconductor technology, identifying defects is converted into a challenge for different modules in the fabrication of chips. Yield engineers often do bitmap on a memory circuit array (SRAM) to identify the failure bits. This is followed by a wafer stripback to look for visual defects at each deprocessed layer for feedback to the Fab. However, to identify the root cause of a problem, Fab engineers must be able to detect similar defects either on the product wafers in process or some short loop test wafers. In the photolithography process, we recognize that the detection of defects is becoming as important as satisfying the critical dimension (CD) of the device. For a multi-level metallization chemically mechanical polish backend process, it is very difficult to detect missing contacts or via at the masking steps due to metal grain roughness, film color variation and/or previous layer defects. Often, photolithography engineer must depend on Photo Cell Monitor (PCM) and short loop experiments for controlling baseline defects and improvement. In this paper, we discuss the findings on the Poly mask PCM and the Contact mask PCM. We present the comparison between the Poly mask and the Contact mask of the I-line Phase Shifted Via mask and DUV mask process for a 0.18 micron process technology. The correlation and the different type of defects between the Contact PCM and the Poly Mask are discussed. The Contact PCM was found to be more sensitive and correlated to contact failure at sort yield better. We also dedicate to study the root cause of a single closed contact hole in the Contact mask short loop experiment for a 0.18 micron process technology. A single closed contact defect was often caused by the developer process, such as bubbles in the line, resist residue left behind, and the rinse mechanism. We also found surfactant solution helps to improve the surface tension of the wafer for the developer process and this prevents/eliminates a single closed contact hole defects. The applications and effects of using different substrates like SiON, different thicknesses of Oxides, and Poly in the Contact Photo Mask is shown. Finally, some defect troubleshooting techniques and the root cause analysis are also discussed.
In the next few years, advanced process technologies in Wafer Fabs will migrate rapidly to ArF lithography for the 100 nm node and beyond. Reticle enhancement techniques (OPC, PSM) will be used more widely in multiple masking layers. However, a challenge in the manufacturing of OPC/PSM reticles is the lack of a precise specification for defect inspection to reflect the printability on wafers. In this paper, a binary mask with OPC/SB and with both CF/DF polarities comprising of 3 design rules: 0.13, 0.15 and 0.18 micrometer, will be used for the defect printability study. Polysilicon test wafers with SiON anti-reflective film will be processed with a standard 248 nm DUV resist on the ASM5500/500 scanner and with a 193 nm resist on the ASM5500/900 scanner, using the highest NA (0.63) an the highest sigma (0.60) possible. Differential SEM CDs between defect features and nominal features (without defect) will be analyzed for each design rule and for each wavelength respectively. SEM images of Clear and Dark field patterns for 193 nm exposure will be shown qualitatively. Finally, the impact of scattering bar sizing and reticle repairs to the wafer printability at 193 nm will be discussed.
As advanced process technologies in the wafer fabs push the patterning processes toward lower k1 factor for sub-wavelength resolution printing, reticles are required to use optical proximity correction (OPC) and phase-shifted mask (PSM) for resolution enhancement. For OPC/PSM mask technology, defect printability is one of the major concerns. Current reticle inspection tools available on the market sometimes are not capable of consistently differentiating between an OPC feature and a true random defect. Due to the process complexity and high cost associated with the making of OPC/PSM reticles, it is important for both mask shops and lithography engineers to understand the impact of different defect types and sizes to the printability. Aerial Image Measurement System (AIMS) has been used in the mask shops for a number of years for reticle applications such as aerial image simulation and transmission measurement of repaired defects. The Virtual Stepper System (VSS) provides an alternative method to do defect printability simulation and analysis using reticle images captured by an optical inspection or review system. In this paper, pre- programmed defects and repairs from a Defect Sensitivity Monitor (DSM) reticle with 200 nm minimum features (at 1x) will be studied for printability. The simulated resist lines by AIMS and VSS are both compared to SEM images of resist wafers qualitatively and quantitatively using CD verification.Process window comparison between unrepaired and repaired defects for both good and bad repair cases will be shown. The effect of mask repairs to resist pattern images for the binary mask case will be discussed. AIMS simulation was done at the International Sematech, Virtual stepper simulation at Zygo and resist wafers were processed at AMD-Submicron Development Center using a DUV lithographic process for 0.18 micrometer Logic process technology.
Manufacturing processes for submicron integrated circuits require strict process control for minimizing defects during the fabrication process. Defect densities are monitored on product wafers to determine whether the line maintains an acceptable yield level and to prevent any catastrophic downfall. However, defect detection is difficult for multilayer devices. A short loop defect monitor is often employed in the Photolithography area for inspection on an automated wafer inspection system like the KLA 213x. This monitor usually uses clean bare Silicon wafers which are processed through a Photocluster cell to define a resist pattern for defect inspection. In order to monitor a large set of equipment and resist types, a large quantity of clean Silicon wafers are required. The reuse of these silicon photo monitor wafers becomes difficult due to particles left on wafers after resist clean. Thus, the cost of daily photo defect monitor for equipment/process control becomes considerable. In this paper, we will discuss reusable thermal oxide test wafers as an alternative solution to Si wafers for a cost effective photo defect monitor. The required oxide thickness for I-line and DUV resists was calculated from Prolith/2 simulation. By using a special clean with Sulfuric Acid/Hydrogen Peroxide mixture (SPM) and followed by an Ammonium Hydroxide/Hydrogen Peroxide mixture (APM) for resist strip, very low particle counts were achieved for oxide substrate and better than those of Silicon wafers. Furthermore, due to low oxide thickness loss per clean cycle (1 - 2 A), oxide test wafers retain the optical characteristics for defect metrology tools to work without any recalibration. This makes the oxide photo defect monitor process very robust and production worthy. KLA defect data on unpatterned and patterned oxide test wafers for 20 or more reworks, will be shown. They will be compared to control Silicon test wafers. Some issues with exposure and focus condition and their effect on KLA defect detection will be discussed. Finally, a simple cost analysis model will show the potential saving benefit of oxide test wafer.
As device geometries shrink into the sub-half micron regime, controlling and reducing defect levels becomes increasingly important in both R&D and Manufacturing environments. Any delay in addressing the causes and cures of these yield killers can prolong the development cycle and production release of new product technologies. However, defect evaluation for a new lithography process on product wafers is difficult due to metrology limitation, substrate noises and previous layer defects. This problem is particularly pronounced for backend layers where differences in the metal grain sizes and reflectivity can confound defect inspection tools and can be picked up as false defects. Often yield learning is long delayed awaiting sort data, before lithographers can determine the beneficial effects of proposed manufacturing improvements. In this paper, we will discuss a methodology for optimizing an I-line lithographic process with the aid of a photo defect monitor. Clean Silicon wafers were fully processed through a photocluster cell to simulate the actual processing conditions for the product, then inspected on a KLA 2132 for pattern defects. An in-line low voltage SEM system was used to review and to classify defect types. In a case study presented here, post develop residue was found to be the predominant defect for a new I-line resist used in the backend layers of the 0.25 micrometer process technology. The resolution of the resist residue deposition problem was commenced by evaluating different processes with multiple puddles/rinses for their defect densities. Based on this work, a low defect developer process was chosen for further study. Other process variables such as resist profile, CD uniformity and Etch bias as well as electrical defect parameters were compared between the old and the new processes. The goal is to demonstrate that given equal performance in all other respects, a quick implementation of this new low defect process, prior to the sort yield confirmation, would not have any detrimental effect on device yield. An example of a non- killer defect, water stain droplets, discovered during the defect review will be shown. Further refining of the dry cycle in the process eliminated this cosmetic defect. Finally, the KLA defect trend chart will show an improvement in defect density with the new develop process.
Accurate and reproducible microlithography processing is critical for developing smaller
and more dimensionally accurate semiconductor structures. As modern microprocessors
and memory devices scale down to deep submicron dimensions, defects originating in the
microlithography processes become increasingly effective in reducing yield. Careful and
efficient methods of measuring the variability of these defect levels by utilizing a shortloop
monitoring process is essential in controlling the quality of lithography process for
these semiconductor devices. During the conventional photo process, a defect can result
from either an external process variable (e.g. manual wafer handling), or an internal one
from environmental sources (unclean equipment sets). Others may be related to the
process parameters themselves; such as a pattern anomaly, marginal processing by the
equipment, or a previous defect on the wafer creating a nucleation site for more defects.
Since microlithography defects can arise from a variety of sources, adopting flexible and
efficient methods of measuring their effects are essential in maximizing the yield.
This study will discuss the methodologies used to characterize and monitor complete
microlithography processing for two distinct cases: one in which the resist is mostly
unexposed with the exception of a pattern of contact holes, and one in which most of the
resist is exposed, leaving behind a developed pattern of resist lines. These two strategies,
when used in conjunction and properly sampled in a defect metrology tool can lead to
timely in-line feedback about the nature of possible processing defects present.
Furthermore, the results of such a short loop may suggest continued short loop processing
involving fewer processing steps to narrow the source.
The three conventional techniques--optical, low voltage scanning electron microscopy (LVSEM), and electrical linewidth measurement--continue to be employed, but each technique has unique applications, problems, and limitations. In this paper these techniques are investigated for submicron linewidth metrology. A great deal of emphasis is placed on the calibration of these tools and the potential for problems associated with the tools.
Results are presented from a new high numerical aperture (NA 0. 48) iline 5X reduction lens which resolves 0. 5 micron lines and spaces over greater than 1 micron depth of focus in several commercially available i-line resists. The performance of this lens is contrasted with that of a NA 0. 40 i-line lens. The NA 0. 40 lens has better depth of focus for 0. 7 microns lines and spaces (L/S) and larger while the NA 0. 48 lens has better depth of focus for L/S smaller than 0. 7 microns down to a resolution cutoff near 0. 35 micron L/S. Other characteristics of the lens such as its relative insensitivity to absorption heating effects and its behavior as a function of the overpressure of He gas within the lens are explored. Simulation work suggests that a NA of between 0. 5 and 0. 55 is optimum for printing 0. 5 micron L/S. Further it suggests that there may be sufficient depth of focus at 0. 4 micron L/S to make i-line a competitor to DUV lithography for the 64 Mbit DRAM generation. 1.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.