Paper
13 March 2013 Sparseness constrained nonnegative matrix factorization for unsupervised 3D segmentation of multichannel images: demonstration on multispectral magnetic resonance image of the brain
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 8669, Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing; 866938 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2000529
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2013, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando Area), Florida, United States
Abstract
A method is proposed for unsupervised 3D (volume) segmentation of registered multichannel medical images. To this end, multichannel image is treated as 4D tensor represented by a multilinear mixture model, i.e. the image is modeled as weighted linear combination of 3D intensity distributions of organs (tissues) present in the image. Interpretation of this model suggests that 3D segmentation of organs (tissues) can be implemented through sparseness constrained factorization of the nonnegative matrix obtained by mode-4 unfolding of the 4D image tensor. Sparseness constraint implies that only one organ (tissue) is dominantly present at each pixel or voxel element. The method is preliminary validated, in term of Dice's coefficient, on extraction of brain tumor from synthetic multispectral magnetic resonance image obtained from the TumorSim database.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Ivica Kopriva, Ante Jukić, and Xinjian Chen "Sparseness constrained nonnegative matrix factorization for unsupervised 3D segmentation of multichannel images: demonstration on multispectral magnetic resonance image of the brain ", Proc. SPIE 8669, Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, 866938 (13 March 2013); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2000529
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Image segmentation

3D image processing

3D modeling

Tissues

Tumors

Brain

Neuroimaging

Back to Top