PurposeThe limited volume of medical training data remains one of the leading challenges for machine learning for diagnostic applications. Object detectors that identify and localize pathologies require training with a large volume of labeled images, which are often expensive and time-consuming to curate. To reduce this challenge, we present a method to support distant supervision of object detectors through generation of synthetic pathology-present labeled images.ApproachOur method employs the previously proposed cyclic generative adversarial network (cycleGAN) with two key innovations: (1) use of “near-pair” pathology-present regions and pathology-absent regions from similar locations in the same subject for training and (2) the addition of a realism metric (Fréchet inception distance) to the generator loss term. We trained and tested this method with 2800 fracture-present and 2800 fracture-absent image patches from 704 unique pediatric chest radiographs. The trained model was then used to generate synthetic pathology-present images with exact knowledge of location (labels) of the pathology. These synthetic images provided an augmented training set for an object detector.ResultsIn an observer study, four pediatric radiologists used a five-point Likert scale indicating the likelihood of a real fracture (1 = definitely not a fracture and 5 = definitely a fracture) to grade a set of real fracture-absent, real fracture-present, and synthetic fracture-present images. The real fracture-absent images scored 1.7±1.0, real fracture-present images 4.1±1.2, and synthetic fracture-present images 2.5±1.2. An object detector model (YOLOv5) trained on a mix of 500 real and 500 synthetic radiographs performed with a recall of 0.57±0.05 and an F2 score of 0.59±0.05. In comparison, when trained on only 500 real radiographs, the recall and F2 score were 0.49±0.06 and 0.53±0.06, respectively.ConclusionsOur proposed method generates visually realistic pathology and that provided improved object detector performance for the task of rib fracture detection.
Estimating myocardial blood flow (MBF) is essential for diagnosing and risk stratifying myocardial ischemia. Currently, positron emission tomography (PET) is a gold standard for non-invasive, quantitative MBF measurements. In this work, we compare our machine learning derived MBF estimates to PET derived estimates, and 2-compartmental model derived MBF estimates. Our best performing model (ensemble regression tree) had a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.47 ml/min/g. Comparatively, the compartmental model achieved an RMSE of 0.80 ml/min/g. Including CAD risk factors improved flow estimation accuracy for models that trained on feature selected TAC data and worsened accuracy for models that trained on PCA data. Overall, our machine learning approach produces comparable MBF estimations to verified DCE-CT and PET estimates and can provide rapid assessments for myocardial ischemia.
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a widely used metric to quantify the functional significance of stenoses in coronary arteries. FFR is the ratio of pressure before and after a stenosis and is measured using a transducer during coronary catheterization. To avoid unnecessary catheterization, many analytical and data-driven models based on non-invasive imaging have been proposed for FFR estimation. In this study, we construct physics-informed analytical models and datadriven machine learning models for FFR estimation based on CT-derived information. All four models require simple information about suspect stenoses, offering rapid, practical approaches for functional assessment. The four models we study are: (1) a patient-specific blood flow informed pressure drop model based on Navier-Stokes equations, (2) a purely geometric model based on stenosis area reduction, (3) a Gaussian process regression model trained on patient specific stenosis geometry and blood flow data, and (4) a Gaussian process regression model trained only on patient specific stenosis geometry. The models were developed and tested using a simulation study with ground truth FFR values from computational fluid dynamics analysis of blood flow through a population of stenosed arteries. In total, 60 different stenosis conditions based on known prevalence were simulated with a range of measurement errors leading to 10000 data sets. The RMSE of the model estimates for approach 1 through 4 are, 0.19, 0.45, 0.06, 0.14. The flow informed machine learning model leads to ~1% lower bias and ~12% lower variance than the flow informed analytical model. Considering the improved variance performance, the machine learning models likely outperform analytic expressions because they learn optimal regression associations robust to noise. This work suggests that machine learned approaches may be superior to conventional analytic expressions for FFR estimation, particularly when inputs contain realistic measurement error.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.